Skip to content

find data (date) gaps in time series

5 messages · David Winsemius, Marc Schwartz, Stefan Strohmeier

#
Dear R users,

I have a time series of precipitation data. The time series comprises  
~ 20 years and it is supposed to be constant (one value per day), but  
due to some failure of the measuring device some days or periods are  
missing. I would like to find these missing days or periods just to  
get a first idea about the reliability of the measurements. The only  
function I could find was is.constant(), but of course I only get a  
true or false statement instead of the dates missing.
Google searches and a look at the R help mailing did not reveal an  
answer.

Please find attached a few dates of the time series with missing  
values from February to April. I would like R to detect those missing  
dates.

Any hints or solutions are highly appreciated.

Regards,
Stefan Strohmeier

2916 2002-02-17  0.0
2917 2002-02-18  0.3
2918 2002-02-19  3.8
2919 2002-02-20 43.6
2920 2002-02-21  1.0
2921 2002-02-22  5.6
2922 2002-02-23 10.6
2923 2002-02-24  2.8
2924 2002-02-25 19.1
2925 2002-02-26 20.5
2926 2002-03-06  0.0
2927 2002-05-06  0.0
2928 2002-05-07  0.0
2929 2002-05-08  0.0
2930 2002-05-09  0.0
#
On Nov 20, 2009, at 6:26 AM, Stefan Strohmeier wrote:

            
> dtdta <- read.table(textConnection("2916 2002-02-17  0.0
+ 2917 2002-02-18  0.3
+ 2918 2002-02-19  3.8
+ 2919 2002-02-20 43.6
+ 2920 2002-02-21  1.0
+ 2921 2002-02-22  5.6
+ 2922 2002-02-23 10.6
+ 2923 2002-02-24  2.8
+ 2924 2002-02-25 19.1
+ 2925 2002-02-26 20.5
+ 2926 2002-03-06  0.0
+ 2927 2002-05-06  0.0
+ 2928 2002-05-07  0.0
+ 2929 2002-05-08  0.0
+ 2930 2002-05-09  0.0") )

 > dtdta[dtdta$V3 == 0, ]

      V1         V2 V3
1  2916 2002-02-17  0
11 2926 2002-03-06  0
12 2927 2002-05-06  0
13 2928 2002-05-07  0
14 2929 2002-05-08  0
15 2930 2002-05-09  0

You seem to be using "0" as a missing marker. That's bad practice, but  
I suppose it's possble you cannot change how your instruments report.  
You should be using NA and the functions that support proper treatment  
of "missingness".
#
On Nov 20, 2009, at 8:04 AM, David Winsemius wrote:

            
David,

I think that he is actually looking for dates where there is no  
measurement as opposed to dates where the measurement is 0.

Thus:

 > DF
      V1         V2   V3
1  2916 2002-02-17  0.0
2  2917 2002-02-18  0.3
3  2918 2002-02-19  3.8
4  2919 2002-02-20 43.6
5  2920 2002-02-21  1.0
6  2921 2002-02-22  5.6
7  2922 2002-02-23 10.6
8  2923 2002-02-24  2.8
9  2924 2002-02-25 19.1
10 2925 2002-02-26 20.5
11 2926 2002-03-06  0.0
12 2927 2002-05-06  0.0
13 2928 2002-05-07  0.0
14 2929 2002-05-08  0.0
15 2930 2002-05-09  0.0


# Convert V2 to dates
# Default format is "%Y-%m-%d"
# See ?as.Date
DF$V2 <- as.Date(DF$V2)


# Get the range of dates covered
DateRange <- seq(min(DF$V2), max(DF$V2), by = 1)


# Get the dates in DateRange that are not in DF$V2
# See ?"%in%"
 > DateRange[!DateRange %in% DF$V2]
  [1] "2002-02-27" "2002-02-28" "2002-03-01" "2002-03-02" "2002-03-03"
  [6] "2002-03-04" "2002-03-05" "2002-03-07" "2002-03-08" "2002-03-09"
[11] "2002-03-10" "2002-03-11" "2002-03-12" "2002-03-13" "2002-03-14"
[16] "2002-03-15" "2002-03-16" "2002-03-17" "2002-03-18" "2002-03-19"
[21] "2002-03-20" "2002-03-21" "2002-03-22" "2002-03-23" "2002-03-24"
[26] "2002-03-25" "2002-03-26" "2002-03-27" "2002-03-28" "2002-03-29"
[31] "2002-03-30" "2002-03-31" "2002-04-01" "2002-04-02" "2002-04-03"
[36] "2002-04-04" "2002-04-05" "2002-04-06" "2002-04-07" "2002-04-08"
[41] "2002-04-09" "2002-04-10" "2002-04-11" "2002-04-12" "2002-04-13"
[46] "2002-04-14" "2002-04-15" "2002-04-16" "2002-04-17" "2002-04-18"
[51] "2002-04-19" "2002-04-20" "2002-04-21" "2002-04-22" "2002-04-23"
[56] "2002-04-24" "2002-04-25" "2002-04-26" "2002-04-27" "2002-04-28"
[61] "2002-04-29" "2002-04-30" "2002-05-01" "2002-05-02" "2002-05-03"
[66] "2002-05-04" "2002-05-05"

HTH,

Marc Schwartz
#
On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:

            
You're right. I slipped a gear in reading that.
At this point an alternative approach:

# Scan for differences > 1
 > diff(DF$V2)
Time differences in days
  [1]  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  1  8 61  1  1  1

#Records at the start of gaps
 > dtdta[diff(dtdta$V2)>1, ]
      V1         V2   V3
10 2925 2002-02-26 20.5
11 2926 2002-03-06  0.0

$Records at the end of gaps
 > dtdta[c(1, diff(dtdta$V2))>1, ]
      V1         V2 V3
11 2926 2002-03-06  0
12 2927 2002-05-06  0

#Gap dataframe
 > dfgaps <-data.frame( start= DF[c(1, diff(DF$V2))>1, ]$V2, end=  
DF[diff(DF$V2)>1, ]$V2)
 > dfgaps
        start        end
1 2002-03-06 2002-02-26
2 2002-05-06 2002-03-06
David Winsemius, MD
Heritage Laboratories
West Hartford, CT
#
David and Marc,

thank you very much for your quick and professional help.

Both approaches are doing what I was looking for.

Next time I will try to provide an example that is more clearly.

Regards,
Stefan
University of Bayreuth