I wonder if it isn't time to change the reply-to-list policy of R-help and adopt the alternative convention of replying to the author and asking him/her to summarize to the list. Recently R-help has been too busy for me to keep up with. There were quite a few identical responses in the "Finding indices with a certain property" thread, rather than an extended discussion. I think this illustrates the need for a reply to author policy. Does anybody else feel the same way? Martyn -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Reply to list policy
4 messages · Martyn Plummer, Peter Dalgaard, A.J. Rossini +1 more
Martyn Plummer <plummer at iarc.fr> writes:
I wonder if it isn't time to change the reply-to-list policy of R-help and adopt the alternative convention of replying to the author and asking him/her to summarize to the list. Recently R-help has been too busy for me to keep up with. There were quite a few identical responses in the "Finding indices with a certain property" thread, rather than an extended discussion. I think this illustrates the need for a reply to author policy. Does anybody else feel the same way?
Not me. - people often don't get around to summarizing - you don't see whether anyone else replied, so either people get zero responses or responses from everyone. Todays minor storm was an exception to that effect: people replying before responses of others got in. - it is manageable with filtering and threading. (e.g. procmail or gnus)
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
"PDB" == Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> writes:
PDB> Martyn Plummer <plummer at iarc.fr> writes:
>> I wonder if it isn't time to change the reply-to-list policy of
>> R-help and adopt the alternative convention of replying to the
>> author and asking him/her to summarize to the list.
>>
>> Recently R-help has been too busy for me to keep up with.
>> There were quite a few identical responses in the "Finding
>> indices with a certain property" thread, rather than an
>> extended discussion. I think this illustrates the need for a
>> reply to author policy.
>>
>> Does anybody else feel the same way?
PDB> Not me.
Not me, either. Peter summarized my feelings precisely.
PDB> - people often don't get around to summarizing
PDB> - you don't see whether anyone else replied, so either people
PDB> get zero responses or responses from everyone. Todays minor
PDB> storm was an exception to that effect: people replying
PDB> before responses of others got in.
PDB> - it is manageable with filtering and
PDB> threading. (e.g. procmail or gnus)
A.J. Rossini Research Assistant Professor of Biostatistics Center for AIDS Research/HMC Biostatistics/Univ. of Washington Box 359931 Box 357232 206-731-3647 (3693=fax) 206-543-1044 (3286=fax) rossini at u.washington.edu rossini at biostat.washington.edu http://www.biostat.washington.edu/~rossini/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Martyn Plummer wrote:
Recently R-help has been too busy for me to keep up with. There were quite a few identical responses in the "Finding indices with a certain property" thread, rather than an extended discussion. I think this illustrates the need for a reply to author policy. Does anybody else feel the same way?
I do, at least a bit. I expect many people operate an informal reply to author policy anyhow. For example, my response to the which() question would normally have gone only to the author, but I find which() to be a very useful function and was myself unaware of it until quite recently. Hence I also mailed back to r-help. I don't think we would need to formalise such an arrangement, but it is important to encourage posting of summaries if r-help does not carry a comprehensive answer. Cheers, Jonathan. Jonathan Rougier Science Laboratories Department of Mathematical Sciences South Road University of Durham Durham DH1 3LE "[B]egin upon the precept ... that the things we see are to be weighed in the scale with what we know" (Meredith, 1879, The Egoist) -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._