Skip to content

learning R

4 messages · Mark Leeds, Wacek Kusnierczyk, Berwin A Turlach

#
David, Wacek: Just so everyone knows, I just looked and this is 
explained quite clearly in the R Language Reference manual, very 
similarly to what Wacek did below.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:

            
#
markleeds at verizon.net wrote:
thanks, that's good, because i made it up following the page quoted by
david, and if i'm flamed for nonsense, the langref has to be flamed too.

vQ
#
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:57:36 +0100
Wacek Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no> wrote:

            
Actually, no.  :)

I do not remember the details, but I once tried to use the "R Language
Definition" (I presume this is what we are talking about) to support my
argument about some issue I had at that time.  It was pointed out to me
that the "R Language Definition" is a draft, hence not authoritative;
and it seems its status of being a draft has not changed since.

Cheers,

	Berwin
#
Berwin A Turlach wrote:
ok, thanks for the explanation.  i'll add the note 'draft version' to
all my messages, so that i can always fall back on the explanation that
they are not my final opinions.

vQ