An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060215/67780376/attachment.pl
no convergence using lme
2 messages · Margaret Gardiner-Garden, Spencer Graves
2 days later
Without a simple, self-contained, reproducible example, it is impossible to say for sure why "lme" did not converge for you. However, if age were constant within animal, that would surely give the symptom you describe. I might try computing the difference in the range within subject, something like the following: ### NOT TESTED: tapply(VC$Age, VC$animal, function(x)diff(range(x))) If these numbers are all 0, that should answer your question. If not, one must dig deeper. For example, do you get the same error with Outcome~1, etc.? hope this helps. spencer graves
Margaret Gardiner-Garden wrote:
Hi. I was wondering if anyone might have some suggestions about how I can
overcome a problem of "iteration limit reached without convergence" when
fitting a mixed effects model.
In this study:
Outcome is a measure of heart action
Age is continuous (in weeks)
Gender is Male or Female (0 or 1)
Genotype is Wild type or knockout (0 or 1)
Animal is the Animal ID as a factor
Gender.Age is Gender*Age
Genotype.Age is Genotype*Age
Gender.Genotype.Age is Gender*Genotype*Age
If I have the intercept (but not the slope) as a random effect the fit
converges OK
fit1 <- lme(Outcome~Age + Gender + Genotype + Gender.Age + Genotype.Age +
Gender.Genotype.Age,
random=~1|Animal, data=VC)
If I have the slope (but not the intercept) as a random factor it converges
OK
fit2 <- lme(LVDD~Age + Gender + Genotype + Gender.Age + Genotype.Age
+Gender.Genotype.Age,
random=~Age-1|Animal, data=VC)
If I have both slope and intercept as random factors it won't converge
fit3 <- lme(LVDD~Age + Gender + Genotype + Gender.Age + Genotype.Age +
Gender.Genotype.Age,
random=~ Age|Animal, data=VC)
Gives error:
Error in lme.formula(LVDD ~ Age + Gender + Genotype + Gender.Age +
Genotype.Age + :
iteration limit reached without convergence (9)
If I try to increase the number of iterations (even to 1000) by increasing
maxIter it still doesn't converge
fit <- lme(LVDD~Age + Gender + Genotype + Gender.Age + Genotype.Age +
Gender.Genotype.Age,
+ random=~ Age|Animal, data=VC, control=list(maxIter=1000,
msMaxIter=1000, niterEM=1000))
NB. I changed maxIter value in isolation as well as together with two
other controls with "iter" in their name (as shown above) just to be sure (
as I don't understand how the actual iterative fitting of the model works
mathematically)
I was wondering if anyone knew if there was anything else in the control
values I should try changing.
Below are the defaults..
lmeControl
function (maxIter = 50, msMaxIter = 50, tolerance = 1e-06, niterEM = 25,
msTol = 1e-07, msScale = lmeScale, msVerbose = FALSE, returnObject =
FALSE,
gradHess = TRUE, apVar = TRUE, .relStep = (.Machine$double.eps)^(1/3),
minAbsParApVar = 0.05, nlmStepMax = 100, optimMethod = "BFGS",
natural = TRUE)
I was reading on the R listserve that lmer from the lme4 package may be
preferable to lme (for convergence problems) but lmer seems to need you to
put in starting values and I'm not sure how to go about chosing them. I was
wondering if anyone had experience with lmer that might help me with this?
Thanks again for any advice you can provide.
Regards
Marg
Dr Margaret Gardiner-Garden
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
384 Victoria Street
Darlinghurst Sydney
NSW 2010 Australia
Phone: 61 2 9295 8348
Fax: 61 2 9295 8321
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html