Skip to content

truncated regressor

2 messages · Troels Ring, Brian Ripley

#
Dear friends. I have the problem of assessing the importance of bleeding 
times censored at 20 minutes for predicting blood loss incurred after a 
liver biopsy. How would I use the knowledge that the censored values were 
20 minutes or more ?

Best wishes

Troels
Troels Ring, MD
Department of Nephrology
Aalborg Hospital, Denmark
tring at mail1.stofanet.dk 

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
#
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Troels Ring wrote:

            
This is a (partially) missing-value problem.  Are values > 20 mins 
always censored?  If so I would group the times and use an ordered factor
as a regressor.  If you really want a linear effect on, say `bt' you can
use

... + bt + I(bt==20) + ...

which allows a separate value of bt==20 over and above a linear model.

If your times are not all censored, you could build a model for the
missing data and use multiple imputation.  If you need, that, more
details of your problem, please.