An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110417/9bc0b469/attachment.pl>
reporting lme results
2 messages · Pennell, Tanya, Ben Bolker
Pennell, Tanya <tp241 <at> exeter.ac.uk> writes:
I have used lme4 and I have found a significant result
when using anova to compare model 1 and model 2 (where I
took out an interaction).
The result looks like this:
model.3: DIFFERENCE ~ (1 | MALE.ID)
model.2: DIFFERENCE ~ MALE.SPECIES + (1 | MALE.ID)
Df AIC BIC logLik Chisq Chi Df Pr(>Chisq)
model.3 3 1379.7 1387.1 -686.86
model.2 4 1374.1 1384.0 -683.05 7.6235 1 0.005761 **
---
Signif. codes: 0 ?***? 0.001 ?**? 0.01 ?*? 0.05 ?.? 0.1 ? ? 1
Just wondering how I would report this in a scientific paper?
I would say (for example) that a likelihood ratio test of the effect of species on the difference was significant (log-likelihood difference=3.81, p=0.0058). Or something like that. Questions like this might be more appropriate on the r-sig-mixed-models list.