From: Peter Dalgaard
"Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes:
This doesn't look like an R question, as I know of no pre-packaged functionality publicly available that can fit the model
that Elizabeth
described, and it doesn't seem like she's particularly
interested in an
R-based answer, either. My gut feeling is that if there is a test of significance
for beta in such a
model, it probably shouldn't depend upon how f() is fitted,
wavelets or
otherwise. I.e., any test for the linear component in a
partially linear
model ought to do just fine. The main difference here,
from a fully linear
model, is that one no longer can estimate E(y) without
bias, even with the
assumption that the model is correct. What gets messier still is if data-dependent smoothing/de-noising is done in estimating
f(), as that opens
up a whole bucket of nasty creatures. I could be off, though, so take this with a truck-load of NaCl...
Isn't it just a gam() model (package mgcv), if you replace the wavelets with splines?
I believe so.
I haven't messed with this for a decade, but I seem to recall that there's a result to the effect that you need to undersmooth f slightly to get optimal inference for the beta. Perhaps look in Green & Silverman for the reference.
A quote I heard from Prof. David Ruppert: "There are lies, damned lies, and then big O notations." I presume the need to undersmooth is to reduce the bias of the `smooth'. The problem is, by how much should one undersmooth, so the bias would go from O(k*n^-4) to O(k*n^-5) (I'm just making this up, but you get the idea)? Cheers, Andy
Andy From: Spencer Graves
I have seen no replies to this post, and I don't know that I can help, either. However, I wonder if you tried
"RSiteSearch" with your
favorite key words and phrases? For example, I just got
107 hits for
'RSiteSearch("wavelets")'. I wonder if any of them might
help you.
If you'd like further help from this list, please submit another post. However, before you do, I suggest you read the
posting guide!
"www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html". Anecdotal
evidence suggests
that posts more consistent with the guide tend to receive quicker, more useful replies. Best Wishes, spencer graves Elizabeth Lawson wrote:
Hey, I am estiamting a partially linear model
y=X\beta+f(\theta) where the f(\theta) is estiamted using
wavelets.
Has anyone heard of methods to test if the betas are
significant or to address model fit?
Thanks for any thoughts or comments. Elizabeth Lawson
__________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html -- Spencer Graves, PhD Senior Development Engineer PDF Solutions, Inc. 333 West San Carlos Street Suite 700 San Jose, CA 95110, USA spencer.graves at pdf.com www.pdf.com <http://www.pdf.com> Tel: 408-938-4420 Fax: 408-280-7915 ______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
______________________________________________ R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ??ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907