An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20111109/3e751958/attachment.pl>
Web based R-help not a list
14 messages · Sean Robert McGuffee, David Winsemius, Jeff Newmiller +9 more
On 11/9/11 7:22 PM, "David Winsemius" <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Cem Girit wrote:
Hello,
Is there a web version of this R-Help user group
(such as
the ones under Google Groups) such that
There is Nabble. It's not going to make you any friends unless you learn to post in plain text AND to include context ... too often not done by Nabble users. Gmane is also a possible website that can mirror rhelp.
1. I can do a search on any topic over thousands of posts on R easily and effectively
Yes, several. Have you read the information page and the posting guide yet?
2. My mailbox do not overflow with emails so that I do not need to edit it every day
Yes. You were offered an option to get a digest when you signed up.
I'm not sure if this response answers the question. It seems to me that there is not an option to ask for help in R and get the answers to your questions interactively on a webpage without involving your email address. Unfortunately, I see this a lot with many computer based help/communities. What I sometimes do to cope is make a separate email address with google where I just add ".whatever" to the username part and subscribe with it. Then I bother to make a different user on my computer so I don't have to login and out of google on firefox to check it. It seems to me that this is bending over backwards instead of a more obvious solution, but it's the only solution I have found because the people who have helped me the most on this site don't seem to be any different than myself in terms of them being users like you and me without some sort of resource or credential or interest in making the more obviously useful help webpage that your email speaks clearly to me about. I mean, I write that email in my head every time I have a question in R and I think this is a very legitimate question.
3. I can arrange to receive only the responses to my posts automatically
Most people reply to both the poster and the the list, but there is no enforcement mechanism. Your unwillingness to do any extra work to educate yourself is duly noted.
This seems to be an offensive comment from one of the "Asperger's" people that the posting guide refers to. Your question is a good one. I think what R has going for it is that it is really convenient and that there are often very quick and easy answers if you can get to them. The idea that you should have to do extra work to answer simple questions is ludicrous, and what's worse about the current system is that you also have to be exposed to people's negative attitudes such as the one just displayed. Unfortunately, I haven't seen any progress. All I can say is that if you can learn to ignore the emotional tolls that people like this charge, they can be helpful. I don't think we can ever teach them about the consequences of their actions though because they don't have the part of their brain that can experience the bad end of it that we go through when dealing with it.
Speaking only for myself, I will NOT respond to any of your further posts because of your demonstrated privileged attitude.
I wish you had decided this prior to your post, and I hope you get help for your mental problems.
It would not bother me if other regular readers followed my example.
It would bother me.
I'm not sure if this response answers the question. I think it's
sometimes best in the current world just to make a separate email address
and account for computer related help in general. How ironic! I know!
4. The content of the post might be better formatted for more information other than just the text (we now have HTML!)
We do not agree that HTML is a better format. You are welcome to take your questions elsewhere if plain text is not acceptable.
Some of us in the "we" do agree with you. I sometimes wonder if many people on this list aren't familiar with some well done forum web pages. I cite a c++ help page as an example of an extremely well done help and forum webpage: http://www.cplusplus.com/forum/ On that page, there are few simple categories of help: Beginners, Windows Programming, UNIX/Linux Programming, General C++ Programming, Lounge, Jobs. There, too, all of the questions in this email are addressed with answers I approve of. For example, after you login, you can simply search for your question. Many times you find the answer and are done. If not, you can write a nicely formatted question and chose to subscribe to answers or not to just that question. It's ideal and it's what almost all of us who use computers in 2011 expect from awesome programs such as R. I imagine someone in this list could copy and modify that page very easily, but I don't know. Anyway, I would hope that if anyone on this list can do it, it would be a huge contribution to our world if they would. That's my two cents.
5. I can attach pictures to my posts for questions related to plots, results etc. be quick and effective rather than just links to other sites
.pdf and .txt files are acceptable attachments.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
I say again: You are welcome to take your questions elsewhere if plain text is not acceptable.
I say, thank you for your awesome email! I agree completely!
On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Cem Girit wrote:
Hello,
Is there a web version of this R-Help user group
(such as
the ones under Google Groups) such that
There is Nabble. It's not going to make you any friends unless you learn to post in plain text AND to include context ... too often not done by Nabble users. Gmane is also a possible website that can mirror rhelp.
1. I can do a search on any topic over thousands of posts on R easily and effectively
Yes, several. Have you read the information page and the posting guide yet?
2. My mailbox do not overflow with emails so that I do not need to edit it every day
Yes. You were offered an option to get a digest when you signed up.
3. I can arrange to receive only the responses to my posts automatically
Most people reply to both the poster and the the list, but there is no enforcement mechanism. Your unwillingness to do any extra work to educate yourself is duly noted. Speaking only for myself, I will NOT respond to any of your further posts because of your demonstrated privileged attitude. It would not bother me if other regular readers followed my example.
4. The content of the post might be better formatted for more information other than just the text (we now have HTML!)
We do not agree that HTML is a better format. You are welcome to take your questions elsewhere if plain text is not acceptable.
5. I can attach pictures to my posts for questions related to plots, results etc. be quick and effective rather than just links to other sites
.pdf and .txt files are acceptable attachments.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
I say again: You are welcome to take your questions elsewhere if plain text is not acceptable.
David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT
Such a resource would no longer be R-help. You might like stackoverflow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Cem Girit <girit at biopticon.com> wrote:
Hello,
Is there a web version of this R-Help user group (such as
the ones under Google Groups) such that
1. I can do a search on any topic over thousands of posts on R
easily
and effectively
2. My mailbox do not overflow with emails so that I do not need
to
edit it every day
3. I can arrange to receive only the responses to my posts
automatically
4. The content of the post might be better formatted for more
information other than just the text (we now have HTML!)
5. I can attach pictures to my posts for questions related to
plots,
results etc. be quick and effective rather than just links to other
sites
Sincerely,
Cem Girit
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Cem, Thanks for your comments. 1. <http://cran.r-project.org/> and select Search in the left-hand panel. 2. Use a filter to funnel r-help into it's own area and review as desired. 3. I find that there are many posts that have been quite educational and have helped me with analyses. 4. Although HTML produces pretty posts many of us don't find that the information content is increased. 5. Yes, a picture is often worth 1K words and I'll agree there are times when they are needed. However, mailbox size (a picture is often 10K words or more) may be more important than number of messages. Reproducible code usually is sufficient to demonstrate the problem. Clint
Clint Bowman INTERNET: clint at ecy.wa.gov
Air Quality Modeler INTERNET: clint at math.utah.edu
Department of Ecology VOICE: (360) 407-6815
PO Box 47600 FAX: (360) 407-7534
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
USPS: PO Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Parcels: 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, WA 98503-1274
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Cem Girit wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Is there a web version of this R-Help user group (such as
> the ones under Google Groups) such that
>
>
>
> 1. I can do a search on any topic over thousands of posts on R easily
> and effectively
>
> 2. My mailbox do not overflow with emails so that I do not need to
> edit it every day
>
> 3. I can arrange to receive only the responses to my posts
> automatically
>
> 4. The content of the post might be better formatted for more
> information other than just the text (we now have HTML!)
>
> 5. I can attach pictures to my posts for questions related to plots,
> results etc. be quick and effective rather than just links to other sites
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Cem Girit
>
>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
On 9 November 2011 15:24, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
Such a resource would no longer be R-help. You might like stackoverflow.
Perhaps our man was looking for a searchable mail archive? If no one has one, I can set one up pretty quickly. Just let me know... Thanks in advance! -- H
Sent from my mobile device Envoyait de mon portable
On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Hasan Diwan wrote:
On 9 November 2011 15:24, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
Such a resource would no longer be R-help. You might like stackoverflow.
Perhaps our man was looking for a searchable mail archive? If no one has one, I can set one up pretty quickly. Just let me know... Thanks in advance! -- H
No need: ?RSiteSearch http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/ http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/nmz.html http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch/ http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.general http://www.rseek.org/ HTH, Marc Schwartz
On 11-11-09 6:03 PM, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote:
On 11/9/11 7:22 PM, "David Winsemius"<dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:
On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Cem Girit wrote:
2. My mailbox do not overflow with emails so that I do not
need to edit it every day
Yes. You were offered an option to get a digest when you signed up.
I'm not sure if this response answers the question. It seems to me that there is not an option to ask for help in R and get the answers to your questions interactively on a webpage without involving your email address.
You didn't read the other answers in the thread: Jeff Newmiller pointed out stackoverflow. But more generally: if there weren't such a resource, it would be better to create one than to just complain that it doesn't exist. R is a community effort. If something is needed you should contribute it, or contribute resources towards it. Duncan Murdoch
On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Cem Girit wrote:
Hello,
Is there a web version of this R-Help user group
<snip>
Yes. You were offered an option to get a digest when you signed up.
I'm not sure if this response answers the question. It seems to me
that
there is not an option to ask for help in R and get the answers to your questions interactively on a webpage without involving your email
address.
Unfortunately, I see this a lot with many computer based
help/communities.
What I sometimes do to cope is make a separate email address with google where I just add ".whatever" to the username part and subscribe with it. Then I bother to make a different user on my computer so I don't have to login and out of google on firefox to check it. It seems to me that this
is
bending over backwards instead of a more obvious solution, but it's the
only
solution I have found because the people who have helped me the most on
this
site don't seem to be any different than myself in terms of them being
users
like you and me without some sort of resource or credential or interest
in
making the more obviously useful help webpage that your email speaks
clearly
to me about. I mean, I write that email in my head every time I have a question in R and I think this is a very legitimate question.
3. I can arrange to receive only the responses to my posts automatically
Most people reply to both the poster and the the list, but there is no enforcement mechanism. Your unwillingness to do any extra work to educate yourself is duly noted.
This seems to be an offensive comment from one of the "Asperger's" people that the posting guide refers to. Your question is a good one. I think what R has going for it is that it is really convenient and that
there
are often very quick and easy answers if you can get to them. The idea
that
you should have to do extra work to answer simple questions is
ludicrous, There are really many possibilities to find answers. Some of them were shown in earlier posts. I work with R maybe more than 10 years and I still first try to search an answer by CRAN search options and use R-help only as a last resort. I sometimes manage to answer questions of others and more than often I just consult help page and recite part of it to the poster.
and what's worse about the current system is that you also have to be exposed to people's negative attitudes such as the one just displayed. Unfortunately, I haven't seen any progress. All I can say is that if you
can I admit I do not know other help system than MS Windows and some other commercial programs. R seems to me far better because if you really are willing to learn it is extremely helpful to read answers from others. I sometimes check an answer to other question just because I want to see what is going on. And some answers are worth saving as they can be extremely helpful for further work. Regards Petr
learn to ignore the emotional tolls that people like this charge, they
can
be helpful. I don't think we can ever teach them about the consequences
of <snip>
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Hello, Only answer to one but: 1. I can do a search on any topic over thousands of posts on R easily and effectively = www.rseek.org -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Web-based-R-help-not-a-list-tp4021752p4023359.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20111110/d88deb92/attachment.pl>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Cem Girit <girit at biopticon.com> wrote:
Somebody suggested "Stackoverflow" problems as well. These could all be avoided.
I think you misunderstood the mention of 'Stackoverflow'. This is a solution, not a problem! StackOverflow (www.stackoverflow.com) is a question-and-answer website for programmers questions, part of the 'Stack Exchange' network of Q&A sites. Questions on R programming are often asked there, and live quite happily amongst the C, Python, Java etc questions. Questions (and answers) can have rich text, maths, images etc, included, can be edited, ranked, bookmarked, deleted, tagged, marked as duplicate, flagged as useless etc etc by the users. As with any community there's some rules - for example don't ask a question thats mostly statistical (with a bit of R) on www.stackoverflow.com - that should go to www.crossvalidated.com. And as usual, try and create examples that people can cut and paste to duplicate your problem. Head on over, sign up, and ask! There's also a chat forum: http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/106/r Barry
On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Cem Girit <girit at biopticon.com> wrote:
Somebody suggested "Stackoverflow" problems as well. These could all be avoided.
I think you misunderstood the mention of 'Stackoverflow'. This is a solution, not a problem! StackOverflow (www.stackoverflow.com) is a question-and-answer website for programmers questions, part of the 'Stack Exchange' network of Q&A sites. Questions on R programming are often asked there, and live quite happily amongst the C, Python, Java etc questions. Questions (and answers) can have rich text, maths, images etc, included, can be edited, ranked, bookmarked, deleted, tagged, marked as duplicate, flagged as useless etc etc by the users. As with any community there's some rules - for example don't ask a question thats mostly statistical (with a bit of R) on www.stackoverflow.com - that should go to www.crossvalidated.com. And as usual, try and create examples that people can cut and paste to duplicate your problem. Head on over, sign up, and ask!
But one IS expected to: a) search at (least on SO before posting). Questions that duplicate existing Q&A's will be quickly "closed". b) read the guidelines:
There's also a chat forum: http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/106/r Barry
David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT
On 11/10/2011 02:32 PM, Cem Girit wrote:
Hello David,
I am terribly sorry. I could never imagine that my naive
questions could offend an experienced R-user such as you so much that he
would publicly declare that he is no longer going to help me in the future!
Wow; I did not know that using R-Help like this is a cult like activity.
Greetings, I can assure you that your opinion is welcome here. I do not accept views like those expressed above of the kind "quit it, it's the way it works here". Open source software is, like the scientific process, about innovation and open-mindedness, not being held hostage by the past. If good ideas never met controversy, we would live in a perfect world. Speaking of your suggestions, it sure would help to have more content in a posting, such as pictures or data files, but it might limit the portability of the messages: I am quite sure that in five years from now we will be able to access this text. Not so as for auxiliary content. Short-term gains in efficiency might come at the expense of the posting's useful life (i.e. those guys having the very same question as you do). I really like the possibility of accessing this list from an email client, with the old "offline feel" once you downloaded the latest messages in your client, without all sorts of online bells and whistles, but I agree that it's an asset to have a web interface, for those who don't like "the good ol'way". I like the idea of having different ways to do the same things, and that's why I use R. I believe a good approach is like that of the openSUSE forums (just picking a familiar example), with a web interface and also an NNTP access, emulating a mailing list. I would love to have different topics or (for NNTP) different newsgroup channels. It's up to the maintainers or interested contributers. Philippe Baril Lecavalier