Skip to content

What is the most cost effective hardware for R?

5 messages · Barry Rowlingson, Whit Armstrong, Michael Sumner +1 more

#
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:22 PM, John Laing <john.laing at gmail.com> wrote:
Noticing Hugh's .ac.uk email address you do have to factor in the
hassle of getting something as nebulous as cloud computing past the
red tape. "How much will it cost?" says the bureaucrat. "Depends how
much CPU time I need", says the academic. "So potentially, what's the
most?" says the bureaucrat. "Millions,", says the academic, honestly,
adding "but that would only be if my job scheduling went a bit mad and
grabbed a few thousand Amazon cores and thrashed them for weeks
without me noticing". "Okay", says the bureaucrat, "now, can we send
Amazon a purchase order so that Amazon send us an invoice for this
unknown and potentially unpredictable cost first?". "Oh no", says the
academic, "we need a credit card...".

Maybe there are other ways of paying for Amazon cloud CPUs, I've not
investigated. Anyone in academia happily crunching on EC2?

Barry
#
I don't work for Amazon, but here is one of their promo pieces on
using 'spot' instances:
http://youtu.be/WD9N73F3Fao

at about 2:15, they cite University of Melbourne and Universitat de
Barcelona as customers...

My interest in all this cloud talk is that I'll be presenting a
tutorial on R in the cloud at R/Finance.
http://www.rinfinance.com/agenda/

It's really easy to use R in the cloud, even if you don't want to move
your data into s3.

-Whit



On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Barry Rowlingson
<b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
#
Barry, *fortunes* are very auspicious but you are already well represented.

Cheers, Mike.

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Whit Armstrong
<armstrong.whit at gmail.com> wrote:

  
    
#
On May 9, 2012, at 17:46 , Michael Sumner wrote:

            
"..as nebulous as cloud computing..", indeed!

  
    
#
It's not water vapour: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rg12qNRgSag
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:20 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: