Hi,
Is it a good practice to link the channel to the process going to
consume the messages? I do want to close the channel when my consumer
crashed, and let the broker to redeliver unacked message.
{ok, Channel} = amqp_connection:open_channel(Connection),
link(Channel),
Why there is no open_channel_link counterpart, as start and start_link?
This is for case when channel goes down between open_channel and link.
amqp_connection:open_channel link channel
2 messages · Matwey V. Kornilov, Jeff Newmiller
I am mystified. Your question lacks any context... it is at best off-topic in R-help. The syntax you show does not seem related to R, and if you were to discuss AMQP as it relates to R then I suspect you would need to post in R-devel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On February 16, 2014 10:04:04 AM PST, "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Is it a good practice to link the channel to the process going to
consume the messages? I do want to close the channel when my consumer
crashed, and let the broker to redeliver unacked message.
{ok, Channel} = amqp_connection:open_channel(Connection),
link(Channel),
Why there is no open_channel_link counterpart, as start and start_link?
This is for case when channel goes down between open_channel and link.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.