Greetings. I'm trying to determine whether to use rpart or randomForest for a classification tree. Has anybody tested efficacy formally? I've run both and the confusion matrix for rf beats rpart. I've looking at the rf help page and am unable to figure out how to extract the tree. But more than that I'm looking for a more comprehensive user's guide for randomForest including the benefits on using it with MDS. Can anybody suggest a general guide? I've been finding a lot of broken links and cs-type of web pages rather than an end-user's guide. Also people's experience on adjusting the mtry param would be useful. Breiman says that it isn't too sensitive but I'm curious if anybody has had a different experience with it. Thanks in advance and apologies if this is too general. Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427
rpart vs. randomForest
2 messages · chumpmonkey@hushmail.com, Martin Maechler
1 day later
"Anonymous" == <chumpmonkey at hushmail.com>
on Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:41:00 -0700 writes:
Anonymous> Greetings. I'm trying to determine whether to use
Anonymous> rpart or randomForest for a classification
Anonymous> tree. Has anybody tested efficacy formally? I've
Anonymous> run both and the confusion matrix for rf beats
Anonymous> rpart. I've looking at the rf help page and am
Anonymous> unable to figure out how to extract the tree.
Anonymous> But more than that I'm looking for a more
Anonymous> comprehensive user's guide for randomForest
Anonymous> including the benefits on using it with MDS. Can
Anonymous> anybody suggest a general guide? I've been
Anonymous> finding a lot of broken links and cs-type of web
Anonymous> pages rather than an end-user's guide. Also
Anonymous> people's experience on adjusting the mtry param
Anonymous> would be useful. Breiman says that it isn't too
Anonymous> sensitive but I'm curious if anybody has had a
Anonymous> different experience with it. Thanks in advance
Anonymous> and apologies if this is too general.
If you really read Breiman, or alternatively, remember English,
you'll know that a forest has many trees...
Regards,
Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/