Hi all, I often run a bunch of code with Run Selection, and, after it's done running, I find there have been like 20 errors, all due to an error that occurred early in my code, which caused problems from there on. (I must then scroll up through lots of code to find it.) What I would like is for R to stop executing when an error occurs. I am aware of a few solutions: 1. Put all the code in a function 2. Put all the code in a tryCatch statement with error handling 3. *partial solution only* Replace stop() with my own function, so at least if the errors are coming from a call to stop, I can catch them and halt all code execution. (I do this halting with a hack involving quit() and .Last(), so also please let me know if there's a better way) However, I don't want to put all the code in braces while I'm just developing/playing around with code. I run various snippets of code all the time, and it's time consuming to always make a tryCatch or function surrounding whatever I'm executing. Is there any way to do a kind of global error handling, so I could source() some file once and then have it set for the rest of my session that day? To see multiple errors that R doesn't stop, you can put these 2 lines into a script and do Run Selection: 5[[2]] <- 1 list() <- 1 You'll notice that 2 errors occur, whereas what I want is for execution to just stop after the first error, so that the second line never gets run. Thanks very much, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code-execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch-tp4640023.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Stopping all code execution when ANY error occurs (OR error handling without try/tryCatch)
7 messages · Bert Gunter, Uwe Ligges, enocko +3 more
1. You probably need to tell us on what platform (OS, version) you are running, as requested by the posting guide. 2. To me, it sounds like your question is: How can I avoid using the error trapping tools built into R but still trap errors. If so, pretty nonsensical, no? 3. But maybe someone else can suggest something useful. My thought is that what you really need is to think out of the box and use a better IDE. Check out CRAN for alternatives, but ESS, RStudio, Tinn-R, and WInedit immediately come to mind. what will work for you depends on your platform (ergo 1 above). Cheers, Bert
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:07 AM, enocko <enotrash at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I often run a bunch of code with Run Selection, and, after it's done running, I find there have been like 20 errors, all due to an error that occurred early in my code, which caused problems from there on. (I must then scroll up through lots of code to find it.) What I would like is for R to stop executing when an error occurs. I am aware of a few solutions: 1. Put all the code in a function 2. Put all the code in a tryCatch statement with error handling 3. *partial solution only* Replace stop() with my own function, so at least if the errors are coming from a call to stop, I can catch them and halt all code execution. (I do this halting with a hack involving quit() and .Last(), so also please let me know if there's a better way) However, I don't want to put all the code in braces while I'm just developing/playing around with code. I run various snippets of code all the time, and it's time consuming to always make a tryCatch or function surrounding whatever I'm executing. Is there any way to do a kind of global error handling, so I could source() some file once and then have it set for the rest of my session that day? To see multiple errors that R doesn't stop, you can put these 2 lines into a script and do Run Selection: 5[[2]] <- 1 list() <- 1 You'll notice that 2 errors occur, whereas what I want is for execution to just stop after the first error, so that the second line never gets run. Thanks very much, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code-execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch-tp4640023.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics Internal Contact Info: Phone: 467-7374 Website: http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm
Easy: Wrap your code into a function. A function by default exits on the first error. Best, Uwe Ligges
On 11.08.2012 10:07, enocko wrote:
Hi all, I often run a bunch of code with Run Selection, and, after it's done running, I find there have been like 20 errors, all due to an error that occurred early in my code, which caused problems from there on. (I must then scroll up through lots of code to find it.) What I would like is for R to stop executing when an error occurs. I am aware of a few solutions: 1. Put all the code in a function 2. Put all the code in a tryCatch statement with error handling 3. *partial solution only* Replace stop() with my own function, so at least if the errors are coming from a call to stop, I can catch them and halt all code execution. (I do this halting with a hack involving quit() and .Last(), so also please let me know if there's a better way) However, I don't want to put all the code in braces while I'm just developing/playing around with code. I run various snippets of code all the time, and it's time consuming to always make a tryCatch or function surrounding whatever I'm executing. Is there any way to do a kind of global error handling, so I could source() some file once and then have it set for the rest of my session that day? To see multiple errors that R doesn't stop, you can put these 2 lines into a script and do Run Selection: 5[[2]] <- 1 list() <- 1 You'll notice that 2 errors occur, whereas what I want is for execution to just stop after the first error, so that the second line never gets run. Thanks very much, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code-execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch-tp4640023.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Hi, thanks for the ideas, folks. I'm on Windows 7, R 2.15.0 x64, RStudio 0.97.71. I do appreciate your time... I would like to say my goal of dealing with errors without R's error trapping tools is not nonsensical given that those tools are cumbersome and not well-suited to the development phase of coding where one informally runs various snippets all the time. The suggestion of looking at IDE's is a good one because it would not be hard for an IDE to just wait and see if any line of code gives an error, and halt execution if so (a global option could enable this). RStudio doesn't have this--does anyone know of something that does? I can post a suggestion to RStudio. Thanks, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code-execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch-tp4640023p4640073.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,
Something like this?
x <- 1:5 # vector with more than one element
# warning, execution continues
if(x == 2) print(2) else print("No!")
ow <- options(warn = 2) # all warnings are now errors
# error, else clause not executed
if(x == 2) print(2) else print("No!")
options(ow) # reset default warn level
(Another way is the well known print function plus wait for execution to
stop.)
Hope this helps,
Rui Barradas
Em 12-08-2012 02:56, enocko escreveu:
Hi, thanks for the ideas, folks. I'm on Windows 7, R 2.15.0 x64, RStudio 0.97.71. I do appreciate your time... I would like to say my goal of dealing with errors without R's error trapping tools is not nonsensical given that those tools are cumbersome and not well-suited to the development phase of coding where one informally runs various snippets all the time. The suggestion of looking at IDE's is a good one because it would not be hard for an IDE to just wait and see if any line of code gives an error, and halt execution if so (a global option could enable this). RStudio doesn't have this--does anyone know of something that does? I can post a suggestion to RStudio. Thanks, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code-execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch-tp4640023p4640073.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Hi Phil, I really have to concur with Uwe Ligges here. You probably want to wrap everything in a function. Because usually this is where long lines of code will end up. The browser() function makes this option really useful, as you can step inside the temporary environment and work from there as if you are in the global environment with the added benefits that all your variables will be gone when you exit the execution, so you start with a new blank environment the next time you call the function. And if you put the browser call to the botton of your functions, any error before will halt execution. The downsites are, that you need to execute the function code each time you make changes to the function prior to rerunning it. But IDEs will help on this by sourcing a function qith simple keystrokes (e.g., C-c C-f in ESS-Emacs). However, if there is a syntax error, the original problem remains. An alternative to browser() is to use options(error = recover) when working with functions. It is also extremely helpful, as it brings you to the point of the function where the error occurs to work from there. Give it a try. BTW, I got the info with browser(error = recover) from the Chambers book: Sofwtare for Data analysis. It is worth a buy. Cheers, Henrik enocko schrieb:
Hi, thanks for the ideas, folks. I'm on Windows 7, R 2.15.0 x64, RStudio 0.97.71. I do appreciate your time... I would like to say my goal of dealing with errors without R's error trapping tools is not nonsensical given that those tools are cumbersome and not well-suited to the development phase of coding where one informally runs various snippets all the time. The suggestion of looking at IDE's is a good one because it would not be hard for an IDE to just wait and see if any line of code gives an error, and halt execution if so (a global option could enable this). RStudio doesn't have this--does anyone know of something that does? I can post a suggestion to RStudio. Thanks, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code-execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch-tp4640023p4640073.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dipl. Psych. Henrik Singmann PhD Student Albert-Ludwigs-Universit?t Freiburg, Germany http://www.psychologie.uni-freiburg.de/Members/singmann
In RStudio use
File > New > R Script
to make a script window (and file) and run it using
Code > Source
(or Control-Shift-S). The script will stop at the first error.
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
-----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of enocko Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:57 PM To: r-help at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Stopping all code execution when ANY error occurs (OR error handling without try/tryCatch) Hi, thanks for the ideas, folks. I'm on Windows 7, R 2.15.0 x64, RStudio 0.97.71. I do appreciate your time... I would like to say my goal of dealing with errors without R's error trapping tools is not nonsensical given that those tools are cumbersome and not well-suited to the development phase of coding where one informally runs various snippets all the time. The suggestion of looking at IDE's is a good one because it would not be hard for an IDE to just wait and see if any line of code gives an error, and halt execution if so (a global option could enable this). RStudio doesn't have this--does anyone know of something that does? I can post a suggestion to RStudio. Thanks, Phil -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stopping-all-code- execution-when-ANY-error-occurs-OR-error-handling-without-try-tryCatch- tp4640023p4640073.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.