Skip to content

glm families in R

2 messages · Francisco Cribari, Peter Dalgaard

#
Is the following difference between S+ and R normal or is it a bug? 
Thanks. FC. 

PS: S+ 4.5 for Windows and R 0.63.1 for Windows. 

S-PLUS output:
R output:
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
#
"Francisco Cribari" <cribari at de.ufpe.br> writes:
This is normal, R doesn't use $deriv in glm families. However,
function (eta) 
-1/(2 * eta^1.5)
<environment: 0x4059d28c>