Skip to content

LM/two way analysis/classic parametrisation

4 messages · kfl, David Winsemius, Rolf Turner

kfl
#
I will be pleased to know, how to get the classic parametrisation in a two
way analysis of varians:

Classic parametrisation:
Observed = intercept + row-effect + col-effect+ error, where sum af
row-effect=0 and sum of col_effect=0 



--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/LM-two-way-analysis-classic-parametrisation-tp3573453p3573453.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
#
On Jun 4, 2011, at 10:33 AM, kfl wrote:

            
?contrasts # which has a link to contr.sum
kfl
#
Thank you for your reply. 

However, I don't undestand what your are telling me. 

I would be pleased if you could give me the synstax in the following
examples:

#Exampel page side 372
trt<-gl(3,4,12,labels=c("T1","T2","T3"))
blk<-gl(4,1,12,labels=c("B1","B2","B3","B4"))
res<-c(13,7,9,3,6,6,3,1,11,5,15,5)
p372<-data.frame(trt,blk,res)
attach(p372)

model<-lm(res~trt+blk)
summary(model)
anova(model)
model.matrix(model)

I want to have a print from the classic parametrisation 

What should be added in the model statement ?


--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/LM-two-way-analysis-classic-parametrisation-tp3573453p3575143.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
#
On 06/06/11 03:01, kfl wrote:
Nothing.  Did you ***read*** the help for contrasts() as you were 
advised to do?

To spell it out:

trt<- gl(3,4,12,labels=c("T1","T2","T3"))
blk<- gl(4,1,12,labels=c("B1","B2","B3","B4"))
contrasts(trt)<- "contr.sum"
contrasts(blk)<- "contr.sum"
# Alternatively set the contrasts equal to "contr.sum" globally:
# options(contrasts=c("contr.sum","contr.poly"))
res<- c(13,7,9,3,6,6,3,1,11,5,15,5)
p372<- data.frame(trt,blk,res)
fit<- lm(res ~ trt + blk,data=p372) # DON'T use attach()!  Use the data argument for lm().
summary(fit)

	cheers,

		Rolf Turner