Rolf Turner wrote:
On 26/01/2008, at 10:54 AM, Carson Farmer wrote:
Dear List, I am attempting to perform a harmonic analysis on a time series of snow depth, in which the annual curve is essentially asymmetric (i.e. snow accumulates slowly over time, and the subsequent melt occurs relatively rapidly). I am trying to fit a curve to the data, however, the actual frequency is unknown.
In general the actual frequency of the curve will indeed be close to 1/(1 year). However, because I intend to perform this analysis on many regions, this will not always be the case. This is perhaps an acceptable assumption however...
Obviously there is something I am not understanding here.
I would have thought that the ``actual frequency'' would
be 1/(1 year) (period = 1 year) --- modulo the fact that
the length of the year is constantly changing a tiny bit.
(But I would've thought that this would have no practical
impact in respect of any observed series.)
My sampling interval is daily.
What is your sampling interval, BTW? Day? Week? Month?
I have been trying to follow the methods in Peter Bloomfields text "Fourier Analysis of Time Series", but am having trouble implementing this in R.
Yes it certainly would.
Note that even though the ``actual frequency'' is (???) 1/(1 year),
the representation of the mean function in terms of sinusoids
will involve in theory infinitely many terms/frequencies since
the mean function is clearly (!) not a sinusoid.
Does anyone have any suggestions, or perhaps directions on how this might be done properly? Am I using the right methods for fitting an asymmetric curve?
What I am really trying to do is fit a relatively smooth line to my data which will preferentially weight the larger values. This method needs to be able to fit through data gaps however, which is why I was originally looking to fit sinusoids. A jpg of a single year of the data is available here: <http://www.geog.uvic.ca/spar/carson/snowDepth.jpg> to give you an idea of the shape of my curve. Thank you again for your help, Carson
I would have to know more about what you are *really* trying
to do, and what the data are like, before I could make any
useful suggestions. Many modelling issues could come into
play, and many modelling strategies are potentially applicable.
cheers,
Rolf Turner