[R-pkg-devel] Warning 'as.data.frame.POSIXct()' is deprecated
Apologies - I've not had enough caffeine just yet. The reprex below highlights the issue but I think the code which implemented the change *may* need tweaking not lapply. Tim
On 06/07/2023 09:26, Tim Taylor wrote:
This *may* be an issue in lapply.? Let's see what others day. Reprex
below
Sys.setenv("_R_CHECK_AS_DATA_FRAME_EXPLICIT_METHOD_" = TRUE)
dat <- Sys.Date()
as.data.frame(dat)
#>????????? dat
#> 1 2023-07-06
lapply(dat, as.data.frame)
#> Warning: Direct call of 'as.data.frame.Date()' is deprecated.? Use
#> 'as.data.frame.vector()' or 'as.data.frame()' instead
#> [[1]]
#>?????? X[[i]]
#> 1 2023-07-06
Tim
On 06/07/2023 08:54, Vincent van Hees wrote:
Dear all, I see the following warning in my package test results: ``` Warning Direct call of 'as.data.frame.POSIXct()' is deprecated.? Use 'as.data.frame.vector()' or 'as.data.frame()' instead ``` The warning is not always there and I struggle to make it reproducible. I have encountered it in both Ubuntu 22.04 and in Windows 11, in both R 4.3.0 and 4.3.1, in both RStudio and in an GitHub Actions environment (example <https://github.com/wadpac/GGIR/actions/runs/5463862340/jobs/9945096566>). The warning gives the impression that I am doing something that R no longer supports. However, I am not using the command as.data.frame.POSIXct() anywhere directly in my code. When I dive into the code where the warnings occur I see patterns like: ``` now = Sys.time() df = data.frame (time = seq(now, now + 10, by =1),? B? = 1:11) ``` (this is a simplification of for example: https://github.com/wadpac/GGIR/blob/master/tests/testthat/test_read.myacc.csv.R ) Does this mean I am discouraged from putting a vector with POSIXct values in a data.frame? If yes, what would be the recommended work around? I have been trying to find documentation or online discussions about this warning but no luck so far. I see R NEWS <https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/NEWS.html> mentions updates to POSIXct related objects several times in the past year but those seem to be different issues. Best, Vincent ????[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel