Message-ID: <CALEXWq0qvQ_UaMwxMRtGnCRZojHYi=psWEEkPjW5M62+qMVR0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2020-02-10T08:32:41Z
From: Iñaki Ucar
Subject: [R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem
In-Reply-To: <286af54d-2756-073c-d3b2-39e41f33f320@effectivedefense.org>
El lun., 10 feb. 2020 9:24, Spencer Graves <
spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org> escribi?:
> Hello, All:
>
>
> I just ran "revdepcheck::revdep_check" on my development version
> of "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat"; copied below. It ended with
> "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0". That sounds good, except that it also says
> "gamclass 0.58: E: 1", so I'm confused.
>
>
> Two questions:
>
>
> 1. What does the "E: 1" for "gamclass" mean? It sounds
> like an error to me, but that contradicts the final message,
> "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0".
>
>
> 2. How can I even find gamclass? It's not available on
> CRAN. There, Ecdat only has 15 reverse dependencies, not 16. I tried
> install.packages('gamclass'); it said, "package ?gamclass? is not
> available". I tried githubinstall::githubinstall('gamclass'). It said:
>
gamclass existed on CRAN, but was archived:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gamclass. Just ignore it.
I?aki
>
> Select a number or, hit 0 to cancel.
>
> 1: pik-piam/magclass Tools for managing classroom organizations
> 2: tscheypidi/magclass Tools for managing classroom organizations
> 3: rundel/ghclass Tools for managing classroom organizations
>
>
> ** None of that sounds like "gamclass".
>
>
> What do you suggest?
>
>
> I should probably ignore this?
> Thanks,
> Spencer Graves
>
>
> revdepcheck::revdep_check(Ecdat_dir)
> Registered S3 method overwritten by 'revdepcheck':
> method from
> print.maintainers devtools
> ?? INIT ???????????????????????????????????? Computing revdeps ??
> ?? INSTALL ???????????????????????????????????????? 2 versions ??
> Installing CRAN version of Ecdat
> Installing DEV version of Ecdat
> ?? CHECK ????????????????????????????????????????? 16 packages ??
> ? catdata 1.2.2 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? DCchoice 0.0.15 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? discSurv 1.4.1 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? DStree 1.0 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 1
> ? DWreg 2.0 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? Ecfun 0.2-2 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? flexmix 2.3-15 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? gamclass 0.58 ?? E: 1 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? gk 0.5.1 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? micEcon 0.6-14 ?? E: 0 | W: 1 | N: 0
> ? micEconIndex 0.1-6 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? miscTools 0.6-26 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? mssm 0.1.3 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? plm 2.2-0 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? sampleSelection 1.2-6 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> ? SeleMix 1.0.1 ?? E: 0 | W: 0 | N: 0
> OK: 16
> BROKEN: 0
> Total time: 36 min
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]