[R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

 Hi, 

I come back to you? because I have always the problem with devtools::check of my package. 

I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
sylvain at sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz

When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
????????Attaching package: 'dplyr'
????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
??????????????????? filter, lag
????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union

The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace the package conflicted. 
So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 

But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below)

Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
Thanks in advance to your help ! 
Sylvain
-----------------
Below extract of 00check.log 
* checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... ERROR
Installation failed.
See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for details.
* DONE
Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE

Below 00install.out 
* installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ...
** using staged installation
** R
** inst
** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
? there is no package called ?conflicted?
Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
Ex?cution arr?t?e
ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow?
* removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow?







    Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
 FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com>?

New submission

Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
? flowmapping (7:41)

Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email =
"francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))

The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
?thematic cartography of flows and movements?
In title case that is:
?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements?

Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The
vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com
<cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,? l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use r-devel?
I confirm that I didn't received ? error message when I've made dev_tool::check.
How can I solve my problem ?
Thanks in advance Sylvain


nvoy? depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android

? Le lun., mars 25, 2019 ? 23:38, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit :? I cannot beloeve it. But this is certainly not R-devel?

Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply

R CMD check --as-cran

with a recent R-devel? version on the package tarball should reproduce
the findings.

Best,
Uwe Ligges


On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

Hello,
I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE

So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
?? R CMD check results ???????????????????????????? cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 ????
Duration: 54.6s
0 errors ? | 0 warnings ? | 0 notes ?
R CMD check succeeded
Can you? help me to fix the problem?
Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]