[R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_1.0.0.tar.gz
This should be fine. Please always keep <cran-submissions at r-project.org> CCed. Best, Uwe Ligges
On 05.05.2019 14:44, cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
Hi, After I submitted my package I received some remarks e.g add the exmple that I've taken into account. So, I used R-devel CMD check, I've always one 1 note about maintener which it's not a problem to submit and another note due to package size. ... * checking installed package size ... NOTE ? installed size is? 5.0Mb ? sub-directories of 1Mb or more: ??? doc?? 4.4Mb ... I would like to know if I can submit in CRAN with this note if not, do you hnow how I can solve this issue? In vignette directories the html file size is of 4.3MB. I don't know how I can reduce the size. There are a lot of picture (cartography). Thanks in advance to your reply Sylvain Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 21:32:07 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit : On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks! > So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in > 00check.log. > The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author. > I tried to put Authors at R <mailto:Authors at R> and it also generates notes. > Do you have any idea? > > You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log. > Thanks in advance > ---------------- > * using log directory ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck? > * using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316) > * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) > * using session charset: UTF-8 > * using option ?--as-cran? > * checking for file ?cartograflow/DESCRIPTION? ... OK > * this is package ?cartograflow? version ?1.0.0.0? > * package encoding: UTF-8 > * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE > Maintainer: ?Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr
<mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>>?
>
> New submission
>
> Author field should be Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>? Current value is:
>? ? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr
<mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>",
> role = c("cre","aut")),
>? ??????????? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com
<mailto:other.other at gmail.com>",
> role = c("aut")))
That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note is
complaining about that.? I think you probably have put something like
this in your DESCRIPTION file:
Author:? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>", role =
c("cre","aut")),
? ? ? ? ? ? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com
<mailto:other.other at gmail.com>",
role = c("aut")))
and what it is saying is that you should instead use
Authors at R <mailto:Authors at R>:? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>", role =
c("cre","aut")),
? ? ? ? ? ? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com
<mailto:other.other at gmail.com>",
role = c("aut")))
If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE.? To make
it easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of an
issue with the package, they display information about the package
maintainer in a NOTE.? Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, it
would probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for the
message, but that's how it is.
Duncan Murdoch
> * checking package namespace information ... OK > * checking package dependencies ... OK > * checking if this is a source package ... OK > * checking if there is a namespace ... OK > * checking for executable files ... OK > * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK > * checking for portable file names ... OK > * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK > * checking serialization versions ... OK > * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... OK > * checking installed package size ... OK > * checking package directory ... OK > * checking for future file timestamps ... OK > * checking ?build? directory ... OK > * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK > * checking top-level files ... OK > * checking for left-over files ... OK > * checking index information ... OK > * checking package subdirectories ... OK > * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK > * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK > * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK > * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies
... OK
> * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK > * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies > ... OK > * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK > * checking use of S3 registration ... OK > * checking dependencies in R code ... OK > * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK > * checking replacement functions ... OK > * checking foreign function calls ... OK > * checking R code for possible problems ... OK > * checking Rd files ... OK > * checking Rd metadata ... OK > * checking Rd line widths ... OK > * checking Rd cross-references ... OK > * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK > * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK > * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK > * checking Rd contents ... OK > * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK > * checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK > * checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK > * checking examples ... OK > * checking for unstated dependencies in ?tests? ... OK > * checking tests ... OK >? ? Running ?testthat.R? > * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK > * checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK > * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK > * checking PDF version of manual ... OK > * DONE > Status: 1 NOTE > > > Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com <mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>> a ?crit : > > > On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> wrote: >? > Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information.?Right now it stays only > one note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran.?So, I didn't > identified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd > like to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one note.?Sylvain > > It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log. > > Duncan Murdoch > > >? > >? > >? > >? > Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android >? > >? >? ? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 17:09, Ma?lle > SALMON<maelle.salmon at yahoo.se <mailto:maelle.salmon at yahoo.se>
<mailto:maelle.salmon at yahoo.se <mailto:maelle.salmon at yahoo.se>>> a ?crit
> :? ? I'd recommend reading > https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the > book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to > declare dependencies. >? > >? > >? > >? > >? >? ? ? Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST,
cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>
<cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>> skrev: >? > >? >? How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file? >? >? ?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE) >? > Thanks >? > Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android >? > >? >? ? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe > Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>> a ?crit :? .... or forgot to
> declare a dependency on that package in the >? > DESCRIPTION file... >? > >? > Best, >? > Uwe Ligges >? > >? > On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote: >? >> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without >? >> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be >? >> able to help. >? >> >? >> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not >? >> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see
.libPaths()
>? >> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a
library
>? >> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by >? >> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the >? >> package)? Just a wild guess. >? >> >? >> >? >> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>: >? >>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used >? >>> "conflicted". >? >>> >? >>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem >? >>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = >? >>> vI[[i]]) : >? >>>? ? ? there is no package called ?dplyr? >? >>> >? >>> How I can? solve this issue? >? >>> >? >>> Thanks in advance >? >>> >? >>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 ? 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer >? >>> <seb.meyer at fau.de <mailto:seb.meyer at fau.de>
<mailto:seb.meyer at fau.de <mailto:seb.meyer at fau.de>>> a ?crit :
>? >>> >? >>> >? >>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages
which do
>? >>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to > start >? >>> working on these conflicts now. >? >>> >? >>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results >? >>> >
>? >>> I see the following output below these messages >? >>> >? >>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion >? >>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd) >? >>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with
diagnostics:
>? >>>> argument is of length zero
>? >>>
>? >>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>? >>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few
> weeks ago).
>? >>>
>? >>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>? >>>
>? >>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>? >>>
>? >>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>? >>>
>? >>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>? >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019",
> sources =
>? >>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
>? >>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>? >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>? >>> "topright"),
>? >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? col = "grey")
>? >>>
>? >>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos =
> "topright")' is
>? >>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>? >>>
>? >>> Cheers,
>? >>>
>? >>>? ? ??? Sebastian
>? >>>
>? >>>
>? >>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> >? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>>:
>? >>>> >? >>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to >? >>> solve this problem w/o success.?Someone have an idea ?Thanks in
advance
>? >>>> >? >>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> >? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>? >>>>>? ? ? Hi, >? >>>>> >? >>>>> I come back to you? because I have always the problem with >? >>> devtools::check of my package. >? >>>>> >? >>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : >? >>>>> sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain>
<mailto:sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain>> <mailto:sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain>
> <mailto:sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain>>>:~/svn$ bash
R-devel.sh CMD
>? >>> check --as-cran >? >>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz >? >>>>> >? >>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package
dplyr :
>? >>>>>? ? ????????Attaching package: 'dplyr' >? >>>>>? ? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats': >? >>>>>? ? ??????????????????? filter, lag >? >>>>>? ? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base': >? >>>>>? ? ??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union >? >>>>> >? >>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the >? >>> namespace the package conflicted. >? >>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. >? >>>>> >? >>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is
Error in
>? >>> loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below) >? >>>>> >? >>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? >? >>>>> Thanks in advance to your help ! >? >>>>> Sylvain >? >>>>> ----------------- >? >>>>> Below extract of 00check.log >? >>>>> * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ...
ERROR
>? >>>>> Installation failed. >? >>>>> See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for > details. >? >>>>> * DONE >? >>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE >? >>>>> >? >>>>> Below 00install.out >? >>>>> * installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ... >? >>>>> ** using staged installation >? >>>>> ** R >? >>>>> ** inst >? >>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading >? >>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = >? >>> vI[[i]]) : >? >>>>>? ? ? there is no package called ?conflicted? >? >>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> >? >>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart >? >>>>> Ex?cution arr?t?e >? >>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow? >? >>>>> * removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow? >? >>>>> >? >>>>> >? >>>>> >? >>>>> >? >>>>> >? >>>>> >? >>>>> >? >>>>>? ? ? ? Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson >? >>> <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>
<mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>>
> <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com
<mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>>>>
> a ?crit : >? >>>>> >? >>>>>? ? ? FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following > NOTEs >? >>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran: >? >>>>> >? >>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE >? >>>>> Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> >? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>>>?
>? >>>>> >? >>>>> New submission >? >>>>> >? >>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000) >? >>>>> >? >>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: >? >>>>>? ? ? flowmapping (7:41) >? >>>>> >? >>>>> Author field should be Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>
<mailto:Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>>
> <mailto:Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.> <mailto:Authors at R.
<mailto:Authors at R.>>>? Current value is:
>? >>>>>? ? ? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email =
>? >>>>> "francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr
<mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>
> <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr
<mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>>
> <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr
<mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>
> <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr
<mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>>>",
>? >>> role = c("cre","aut")),
>? >>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>? >>>>> "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>
<mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>>
> <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>
<mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>>>", role
>? >>> = c("aut"))
>? >>>>>
>? >>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>? >>>>> ?thematic cartography of flows and movements?
>? >>>>> In title case that is:
>? >>>>> ?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements?
>? >>>>>
>? >>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The
>? >>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>? >>>>>
>? >>>>> /Henrik
>? >>>>>
>? >>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> >? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>>
>? >>>>> <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> Hi,? l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I
have to
>? >>> use r-devel? >? >>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received ? error message when I've made >? >>> dev_tool::check. >? >>>>>> How can I solve my problem ? >? >>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> nvoy? depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>>? ? ? Le lun., mars 25, 2019 ? 23:38, Uwe >? >>> Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>
>? >>> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>>> a ?crit :? I cannot beloeve
>? >>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel? >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> with a recent R-devel? version on the package tarball should > reproduce >? >>>>>> the findings. >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> Best, >? >>>>>> Uwe Ligges >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> >? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>? >>>>>>> Hello, >? >>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an
email from
>? >>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks >? >>> automatically.Debian: >? >>> >
>? >>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE >? >>>>>>> >? >>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu)
and the
>? >>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
>? >>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>? >>>>>>> ?? R CMD check results ???????????????????????????? cartograflow
>? >>> 0.0.0.9000 ????
>? >>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s
>? >>>>>>> 0 errors ? | 0 warnings ? | 0 notes ?
>? >>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded
>? >>>>>>> Can you? help me to fix the problem?
>? >>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>? >>>>>>>? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>? >>>>>>>
>? >>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>? >>>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
>? >>> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>> mailing list
>? >>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? >>>>>>> >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >? >>>>>> >? >>>>>> ______________________________________________ >? >>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>>
>? >>> mailing list >? >>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? >>> >? >>>>>? ? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >? >>>>> >? >>>>> ______________________________________________ >? >>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>>
>? >>> mailing list >? >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? >>>>> >? >>>> >? >>>> ______________________________________________ >? >>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>>
>? >>> mailing list >? >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? >>>> >? >>>> >? >>>> >? >>>>? ? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >? >>>> >? >>>> ______________________________________________ >? >>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>>
>? >>> mailing list >? >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? >>>> >? >> >? >> ______________________________________________ >? >> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> mailing list >? >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? >> >? > >? > >? >? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >? > >? > ______________________________________________ >? > R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> mailing list >? > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? > >? > ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >? > >? > ______________________________________________ >? > R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
> mailing list >? > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >? > >