[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz
On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in
00check.log.
The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors at R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea?
You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.
Thanks in advance
----------------
* using log directory ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck?
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ?--as-cran?
* checking for file ?cartograflow/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* this is package ?cartograflow? version ?1.0.0.0?
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>?
New submission
Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr",
role = c("cre","aut")),
??????????? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))
That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note is
complaining about that. I think you probably have put something like
this in your DESCRIPTION file:
Author: c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))
and what it is saying is that you should instead use
Authors at R: c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))
If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE. To make
it easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of an
issue with the package, they display information about the package
maintainer in a NOTE. Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, it
would probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for the
message, but that's how it is.
Duncan Murdoch
* checking package namespace information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... OK * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking if there is a namespace ... OK * checking for executable files ... OK * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK * checking for portable file names ... OK * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK * checking serialization versions ... OK * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... OK * checking installed package size ... OK * checking package directory ... OK * checking for future file timestamps ... OK * checking ?build? directory ... OK * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * checking top-level files ... OK * checking for left-over files ... OK * checking index information ... OK * checking package subdirectories ... OK * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK * checking use of S3 registration ... OK * checking dependencies in R code ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking Rd metadata ... OK * checking Rd line widths ... OK * checking Rd cross-references ... OK * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK * checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK * checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK * checking examples ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in ?tests? ... OK * checking tests ... OK ? Running ?testthat.R? * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK * checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK * checking PDF version of manual ... OK * DONE Status: 1 NOTE Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit : On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information.?Right now it stays only
one note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran.?So, I didn't identified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one note.?Sylvain It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log. Duncan Murdoch
> > > > Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android > >? ? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 17:09, Ma?lle
SALMON<maelle.salmon at yahoo.se <mailto:maelle.salmon at yahoo.se>> a ?crit :? ? I'd recommend reading https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare dependencies.
> > > > >? ? ? Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> skrev:
> >? How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file? >? ?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE) > Thanks > Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android > >? ? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe
Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a ?crit :? .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the
> DESCRIPTION file... > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
>> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without >> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be >> able to help. >> >> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not >> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths() >> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library >> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by >> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the >> package)? Just a wild guess. >> >> >> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>:
>>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used >>> "conflicted". >>> >>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem >>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = >>> vI[[i]]) : >>>? ? ? there is no package called ?dplyr? >>> >>> How I can? solve this issue? >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 ? 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer >>> <seb.meyer at fau.de <mailto:seb.meyer at fau.de>> a ?crit : >>> >>> >>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do >>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to
start
>>> working on these conflicts now. >>> >>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results >>>
>>> I see the following output below these messages >>>
>>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion >>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd) >>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics: >>>> argument is of length zero
>>> >>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd >>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few
weeks ago).
>>>
>>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>>
>>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>> >>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from >>>
>>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris", >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019",
sources =
>>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS >>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>>> "topright"),
>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? col = "grey")
>>> >>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos =
"topright")' is
>>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer(). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>>? ? ??? Sebastian >>> >>> >>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>:
>>>> >>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
>>> solve this problem w/o success.?Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>>> >>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>? ? ? Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I come back to you? because I have always the problem with
>>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>> >>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : >>>>> sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain> <mailto:sylvain at sylvain
<mailto:sylvain at sylvain>>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
>>> check --as-cran >>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>>> >>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : >>>>>? ? ????????Attaching package: 'dplyr' >>>>>? ? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats': >>>>>? ? ??????????????????? filter, lag >>>>>? ? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base': >>>>>? ? ??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union >>>>> >>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the
>>> namespace the package conflicted.
>>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. >>>>> >>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in
>>> loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below)
>>>>> >>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? >>>>> Thanks in advance to your help ! >>>>> Sylvain >>>>> ----------------- >>>>> Below extract of 00check.log >>>>> * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... ERROR >>>>> Installation failed. >>>>> See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for
details.
>>>>> * DONE >>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE >>>>> >>>>> Below 00install.out >>>>> * installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ... >>>>> ** using staged installation >>>>> ** R >>>>> ** inst >>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading >>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>>> vI[[i]]) :
>>>>>? ? ? there is no package called ?conflicted? >>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts ->
>>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
>>>>> Ex?cution arr?t?e >>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow? >>>>> * removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>? ? ? ? Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson
>>> <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>
<mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>>> a ?crit :
>>>>> >>>>>? ? ? FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following
NOTEs
>>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran: >>>>> >>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE >>>>> Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>>?
>>>>> >>>>> New submission >>>>> >>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000) >>>>> >>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: >>>>>? ? ? flowmapping (7:41) >>>>> >>>>> Author field should be Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>
<mailto:Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>>? Current value is:
>>>>>? ? ? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email =
>>>>> "francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr
<mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr> <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>>",
>>> role = c("cre","aut")),
>>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>>>>> "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>
<mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>>", role
>>> = c("aut"))
>>>>>
>>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>>>>> ?thematic cartography of flows and movements?
>>>>> In title case that is:
>>>>> ?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements?
>>>>>
>>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The
>>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Henrik
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>
>>>>> <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi,? l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to
>>> use r-devel?
>>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received ? error message when I've made
>>> dev_tool::check.
>>>>>> How can I solve my problem ? >>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> nvoy? depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android >>>>>> >>>>>>? ? ? Le lun., mars 25, 2019 ? 23:38, Uwe
>>> Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
>>> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>> a ?crit :? I cannot beloeve
>>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply >>>>>> >>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran >>>>>> >>>>>> with a recent R-devel? version on the package tarball should
reproduce
>>>>>> the findings. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Uwe Ligges >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow at gmail.com
<mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from
>>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks >>> automatically.Debian: >>>
>>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the
>>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
>>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>>>>>>> ?? R CMD check results ???????????????????????????? cartograflow
>>> 0.0.0.9000 ????
>>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s >>>>>>> 0 errors ? | 0 warnings ? | 0 notes ? >>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded >>>>>>> Can you? help me to fix the problem? >>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain >>>>>>>? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
>>> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>> mailing list
>>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
>>> mailing list
>>>
>>>>>? ? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
>>> mailing list
>>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
>>> mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>? ? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>>
>>> mailing list
>> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
> > >? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list