[R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_1.0.0.tar.gz
Hi,
I've made a new submission.
There is no note about checking installed package size.Thanks.
Sylvain
Le dimanche 5 mai 2019 ? 14:44:24 UTC+2, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> a ?crit :
Hi,?
After I submitted my package I received some remarks e.g add the exmple that I've taken into account.
So, I used R-devel CMD check, I've always one 1 note about maintener which it's not a problem to submit and another note due to package size.
...
* checking installed package size ... NOTE? installed size is? 5.0Mb
? sub-directories of 1Mb or more:
??? doc?? 4.4Mb...
I would like to know if I can submit in CRAN with this note if not, do you hnow how I can solve this issue?
In vignette directories the html file size is of 4.3MB. I don't know how I can reduce the size. There are a lot of picture (cartography).
Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 21:32:07 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit :
On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in
00check.log.
The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors at R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea?
You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.
Thanks in advance
----------------
* using log directory ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck?
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ?--as-cran?
* checking for file ?cartograflow/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* this is package ?cartograflow? version ?1.0.0.0?
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>?
New submission
Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? ? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr",
role = c("cre","aut")),
? ??????????? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))
That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note is
complaining about that.? I think you probably have put something like
this in your DESCRIPTION file:
Author:? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
? ? ? ? ? ? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))
and what it is saying is that you should instead use
Authors at R:? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
? ? ? ? ? ? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))
If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE.? To make
it easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of an
issue with the package, they display information about the package
maintainer in a NOTE.? Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, it
would probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for the
message, but that's how it is.
Duncan Murdoch
* checking package namespace information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... OK * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking if there is a namespace ... OK * checking for executable files ... OK * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK * checking for portable file names ... OK * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK * checking serialization versions ... OK * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... OK * checking installed package size ... OK * checking package directory ... OK * checking for future file timestamps ... OK * checking ?build? directory ... OK * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * checking top-level files ... OK * checking for left-over files ... OK * checking index information ... OK * checking package subdirectories ... OK * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK * checking use of S3 registration ... OK * checking dependencies in R code ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking Rd metadata ... OK * checking Rd line widths ... OK * checking Rd cross-references ... OK * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK * checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK * checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK * checking examples ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in ?tests? ... OK * checking tests ... OK ? ? Running ?testthat.R? * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK * checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK * checking PDF version of manual ... OK * DONE Status: 1 NOTE Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit : On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote: ? > Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information.?Right now it stays only one note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran.?So, I didn't identified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one note.?Sylvain It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log. Duncan Murdoch ? > ? > ? > ? > Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android ? > ? >? ? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 17:09, Ma?lle SALMON<maelle.salmon at yahoo.se <mailto:maelle.salmon at yahoo.se>> a ?crit :? ? I'd recommend reading https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare dependencies. ? > ? > ? > ? > ? >? ? ? Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> skrev: ? > ? >? How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file? ? >? ?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE) ? > Thanks ? > Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android ? > ? >? ? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a ?crit :? .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the ? > DESCRIPTION file... ? > ? > Best, ? > Uwe Ligges ? > ? > On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote: ? >> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without ? >> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be ? >> able to help. ? >> ? >> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not ? >> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths() ? >> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library ? >> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by ? >> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the ? >> package)? Just a wild guess. ? >> ? >> ? >> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>: ? >>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used ? >>> "conflicted". ? >>> ? >>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem ? >>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = ? >>> vI[[i]]) : ? >>>? ? ? there is no package called ?dplyr? ? >>> ? >>> How I can? solve this issue? ? >>> ? >>> Thanks in advance ? >>> ? >>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 ? 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer ? >>> <seb.meyer at fau.de <mailto:seb.meyer at fau.de>> a ?crit : ? >>> ? >>> ? >>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do ? >>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start ? >>> working on these conflicts now. ? >>> ? >>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results ? >>> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log), ? >>> I see the following output below these messages ? >>> ? >>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion ? >>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd) ? >>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics: ? >>>> argument is of length zero ? >>> ? >>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd ? >>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago). ? >>> ? >>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see ? >>> ? >>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero ? >>> ? >>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from ? >>> ? >>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris", ? >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources = ? >>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS ? >>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.", ? >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos = ? >>> "topright"), ? >>>>? ? ? ? ? ? col = "grey") ? >>> ? >>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is ? >>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer(). ? >>> ? >>> Cheers, ? >>> ? >>>? ? ??? Sebastian ? >>> ? >>> ? >>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> ? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>: ? >>>> ? >>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to ? >>> solve this problem w/o success.?Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance ? >>>> ? >>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> ? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> wrote: ? >>>>>? ? ? Hi, ? >>>>> ? >>>>> I come back to you? because I have always the problem with ? >>> devtools::check of my package. ? >>>>> ? >>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : ? >>>>> sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain> <mailto:sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain>>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD ? >>> check --as-cran ? >>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz ? >>>>> ? >>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : ? >>>>>? ? ????????Attaching package: 'dplyr' ? >>>>>? ? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats': ? >>>>>? ? ??????????????????? filter, lag ? >>>>>? ? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base': ? >>>>>? ? ??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union ? >>>>> ? >>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the ? >>> namespace the package conflicted. ? >>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. ? >>>>> ? >>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in ? >>> loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below) ? >>>>> ? >>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? ? >>>>> Thanks in advance to your help ! ? >>>>> Sylvain ? >>>>> ----------------- ? >>>>> Below extract of 00check.log ? >>>>> * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... ERROR ? >>>>> Installation failed. ? >>>>> See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for details. ? >>>>> * DONE ? >>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE ? >>>>> ? >>>>> Below 00install.out ? >>>>> * installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ... ? >>>>> ** using staged installation ? >>>>> ** R ? >>>>> ** inst ? >>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading ? >>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = ? >>> vI[[i]]) : ? >>>>>? ? ? there is no package called ?conflicted? ? >>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> ? >>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart ? >>>>> Ex?cution arr?t?e ? >>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow? ? >>>>> * removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow? ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ? >>>>>? ? ? ? Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson ? >>> <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>>> a ?crit : ? >>>>> ? >>>>>? ? ? FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs ? >>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran: ? >>>>> ? >>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE ? >>>>> Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> ? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>>? ? >>>>> ? >>>>> New submission ? >>>>> ? >>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000) ? >>>>> ? >>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: ? >>>>>? ? ? flowmapping (7:41) ? >>>>> ? >>>>> Author field should be Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.> <mailto:Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>>? Current value is: ? >>>>>? ? ? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email = ? >>>>> "francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr> <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>>", ? >>> role = c("cre","aut")), ? >>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = ? >>>>> "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr> <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>>", role ? >>> = c("aut")) ? >>>>> ? >>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is: ? >>>>> ?thematic cartography of flows and movements? ? >>>>> In title case that is: ? >>>>> ?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements? ? >>>>> ? >>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The ? >>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel. ? >>>>> ? >>>>> /Henrik ? >>>>> ? >>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> ? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> ? >>>>> <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>> wrote: ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> Hi,? l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to ? >>> use r-devel? ? >>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received ? error message when I've made ? >>> dev_tool::check. ? >>>>>> How can I solve my problem ? ? >>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> nvoy? depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>>? ? ? Le lun., mars 25, 2019 ? 23:38, Uwe ? >>> Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> ? >>> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>> a ?crit :? I cannot beloeve ? >>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel? ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> with a recent R-devel? version on the package tarball should reproduce ? >>>>>> the findings. ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> Best, ? >>>>>> Uwe Ligges ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> ? >>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> wrote: ? >>>>>>> Hello, ? >>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from ? >>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks ? >>> automatically.Debian: ? >>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log> ? >>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE ? >>>>>>> ? >>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the ? >>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = ? >>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is : ? >>>>>>> ?? R CMD check results ???????????????????????????? cartograflow ? >>> 0.0.0.9000 ???? ? >>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s ? >>>>>>> 0 errors ? | 0 warnings ? | 0 notes ? ? >>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded ? >>>>>>> Can you? help me to fix the problem? ? >>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain ? >>>>>>>? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ? >>>>>>> ? >>>>>>> ______________________________________________ ? >>>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> ? >>> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>> mailing list ? >>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >>>>>>> ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ? >>>>>> ? >>>>>> ______________________________________________ ? >>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>> ? >>> mailing list ? >>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >>> ? >>>>>? ? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ? >>>>> ? >>>>> ______________________________________________ ? >>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>> ? >>> mailing list ? >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >>>>> ? >>>> ? >>>> ______________________________________________ ? >>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>> ? >>> mailing list ? >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >>>> ? >>>> ? >>>> ? >>>>? ? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ? >>>> ? >>>> ______________________________________________ ? >>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>> ? >>> mailing list ? >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >>>> ? >> ? >> ______________________________________________ ? >> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list ? >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >> ? > ? > ? >? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ? > ? > ______________________________________________ ? > R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list ? > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? > ? > ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ? > ? > ______________________________________________ ? > R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list ? > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ? >