[R-pkg-devel] help interpreting a response from CRAN
And one more (last for a while): presumably there is no way to check CRAN windows timing without submitting to CRAN ... ? (I will obviously do my best by doing arithmetic on the tests that I set to be skipped, but it would be nice to be able to double-check without wasting everyone's time ... I guess if I knew that CRAN submissions would *always automatically* be rejected with Windows test times>10 min, I could use CRAN submission itself as my test ... but maybe that's a bad idea?)
On 11/22/20 4:06 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Thanks Dirk. Yes, for lme4 the tests for each archiecture take longer than 5 min, so the overall check time exceeds 10 min. So one can follow Dirk's advise. As a general remark for others who will read this in the future: tests should test the software, but it is generally not important to have real world examples. Small data and few iterations are typically sufficient for tests. It is also possible to run less important tests only conditionally if some environment variable is set that you only define on your machine. Best, Uwe Ligges On 22.11.2020 20:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 22 November 2020 at 13:44, Ben Bolker wrote:
|??? My current guess is that the problem is with the too-long check
time on Windows (NOTE: "Overall checktime 18 min > 10 min")
Yes.
|?? I guess I have to get busy setting more tests and examples to
skip-on-CRAN (kind of a pain as there's no low-hanging fruit - other
than the 'testthat' tests, none of the individual test files take
longer than 15sec, although this is doubled because they have to be
run on 386 and x64 ...)
It's under your control. You can detect 'are we on Windows' and branch
or, as
I do with test runner I use, exit_file("...") based on such conditions.
|?? An alternative is that this is a confusingly worded message
indicating that there are strong rev dependencies so the package needs
to be further checked? (That seems unlikely as it explicitly asks me
to resubmit)
No. If there were any (even false positive ones) they'd be listed there.
Hth, Dirk