On Jul 18, 2023, at 9:07 PM, Gabriel Constantino Blain <gabriel.blain at sp.gov.br> wrote:
?Dears,
I submitted my R package to CRAN.
However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes:
Note 1:
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE
Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain <gabriel.blain at sp.gov.br>'
New submission
Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION:
EP (14:45)
NASAPOWER (11:18)
OperatSDI (12:9)
PowerSDI (7:18, 13:9)
SPEI (3:31, 7:50, 10:20)
SPI (3:23, 7:42, 10:12)
ScientSDI (9:19)
evapotranspitation (13:44)
subperiods (15:76)
Note 2:
Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: examples, Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
ScientSDI 82.71 0.75 88.00
Reference 29.75 0.05 29.80
Accuracy 10.02 1.11 11.12
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Check: examples, Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s
user system elapsed
ScientSDI 52.674 0.176 57.765
Reference 20.749 0.148 20.898
Accuracy 6.001 0.024 6.024
Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled,
EP, SPI and SPEI are acronyms
OperatSDI and ScientSDI are functions of my package
PowerSDI is the name of my package's name
NASAPOWER is the project's name.
Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the time to run the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. There are so many calculations that it does take some time to do it.
The package is available at https://github.com/gabrielblain/PowerSDI
I really appreciate any help you can provide.
Best regards
Gabriel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]