Skip to content
Prev 12031 / 12125 Next

[R-pkg-devel] Package (nprcgenekeepr) archived a few days after publication to CRAN

I don't think that answers the OP's question (why was it archived
after apparently passing checks/being published)?

I do get one error (reproduced below) when I `R CMD check --as-cran`
on Linux with r-devel.

  I would say that the path of least resistance would be: (1) fix the
error (assuming you can reproduce it ...); (2) bump the version number
to 1.0.9 (or 1.0.8.1, whatever); (3) (re)submit to CRAN.

 [24s/43s] ERROR
Running the tests in ?tests/testthat.R? failed.
Last 13 lines of output:
    'test_saveDataframesAsFiles.R:11:3', 'test_saveDataframesAsFiles.R:37:3',
    'test_saveDataframesAsFiles.R:62:3'

  ?? Failed tests
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
  ?? Failure ('test_print.summary.nprcgenekeeprErr.R:29:3'):
print.summary.nprcgenekeeprErr prints expected output ??
  Expected failure message to match regexp "produced output".
  Actual message:
  ? ? Expected `print(summary(qcStudbook(pedOne, reportErrors =
TRUE)))` to produce no output.
    ? Actual output:
    ? Error: The animal listed as a sire and also listed as a female
is: s1.\nError: The animal listed as a dam and also listed as a male
is: d1.\n\nPlease check and correct the pedigree file.\n \nAnimal
records where parent records are suspicous because of dates.\nOne or
more parents appear too young at time of birth.\n  dam sire id sex
 birth recordStatus exit  sireBirth   damBirth sireAge\n2  d2   s1 o2
 F 2009-03-17     original <NA> 2000-07-18 2015-09-16    8.66\n3  d2
s2 o3   F 2012-04-11     original <NA> 2006-06-19 2015-09-16
5.81\n4  d2   s2 o4   M 2006-04-13     original <NA> 2006-06-19
2015-09-16   -0.18\n  damAge\n2   -6.5\n3   -3.4\n4   -9.4

  [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 24 | PASS 861 ]
  Error:
  ! Test failures.
  Execution halted

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 1:13?PM Henrik Bengtsson
<henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: