Skip to content
Back to formatted view

Raw Message

Message-ID: <CAAeMkWvRjYqg+A4HwomfWd6iBPsMfGyZdav+MoN6hd2KZoOGvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2017-08-22T23:37:50Z
From: Bruce Hoff
Subject: [R-pkg-devel] Directing package feedback to Github issues

Hi:

The official instructions for writing an R package (https://cran.r-project.
org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html) states, in part,

"The mandatory ?Maintainer? field should give a *single* name followed by a
*valid* (RFC 2822) email address in angle brackets.... For a CRAN package
it should be a *person*, not a mailing list and not a corporate entity: do
ensure that it is valid and will remain valid for the lifetime of the
package."


It seems like user feedback for a package (e.g. bug reports and feature
requests) to the maintainer would best be provided in terms of issues
opened in an issue tracking system rather than an email sent to a "person,
not a mailing list".  A prominent example is Github issue tracking, where
the Github repository for the issues could be the same issue.

Is there an accepted approach among R package authors to direct users of a
package to an issue tracking system?

Thank you,

Bruce Hoff
Sage Bionetworks

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]