[R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".
Certainly there was more in the output that caused rejection as the stuff you describe below seems to be fine. I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look. Best, Uwe
On 16.10.2023 11:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Whoops, I just read the next line.? Sorry! On 15/10/2023 9:34 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
I have submitted a new package to CRAN, and this package has been knocked back on the basis of a NOTE:
* checking package dependencies ... NOTE Package suggested but not available for checking: 'ionChannelData'
This suggested package consists of data sets, the size of which is too large to satisfy CRAN's constraints. I put this package in a repository on github, from which it can be accessed by users. My DESCRIPTION file contains the line:
Additional_repositories: https://rolfturner.r-universe.dev
The given URL seems to work, in that users can indeed load the ionChannelData package via the command
install.packages("ionChannelData",repos="https://rolfturner.r-universe.dev")
I was under the impression that this was all that I needed to do.? The CRAN checking process acknowledges the existence of the repository in question:
Suggests or Enhances not in mainstream repositories: ?? ionChannelData Availability using Additional_repositories specification: ?? ionChannelData?? yes?? https://rolfturner.r-universe.dev
So CRAN knows about this repository.? Why can it not make use of it? What can/should I do to resolve this problem? I guess I could simply *not* Suggest ionChannelData.? But what then, is the point of the option of including an Additional_repositories field in the DESCRIPTION file? cheers, Rolf Turner
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel