Message-ID: <125199542.27186571.1554390277315@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: 2019-04-04T15:04:37Z
From: c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
Subject: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz
In-Reply-To: <fb2202e2-3f5b-626b-ea30-a103327c8211@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks?
Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android
Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit : .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the
DESCRIPTION file...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
> able to help.
>
> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
> package)? Just a wild guess.
>
>
> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com:
>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
>> "conflicted".
>>
>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>> vI[[i]]) :
>>? ? there is no package called ?dplyr?
>>
>> How I can? solve this issue?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 ? 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
>> <seb.meyer at fau.de> a ?crit :
>>
>>
>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
>> working on these conflicts now.
>>
>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
>> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
>> I see the following output below these messages
>>
>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>>> argument is of length zero
>>
>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).
>>
>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>
>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>
>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>>
>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>>>? ? ? ? ? coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources =
>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>? ? ? ? ? scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>> "topright"),
>>>? ? ? ? ? col = "grey")
>>
>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>? ??? Sebastian
>>
>>
>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
>> solve this problem w/o success.?Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>? ? Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I come back to you? because I have always the problem with
>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>
>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>>> sylvain at sylvain <mailto:sylvain at sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
>> check --as-cran
>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr :
>>>>? ????????Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>>>? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>>>? ??????????????????? filter, lag
>>>>? ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>>>? ??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>>>
>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the
>> namespace the package conflicted.
>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning.
>>>>
>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in
>> loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below)
>>>>
>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible?
>>>> Thanks in advance to your help !
>>>> Sylvain
>>>> -----------------
>>>> Below extract of 00check.log
>>>> * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... ERROR
>>>> Installation failed.
>>>> See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for details.
>>>> * DONE
>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>>>
>>>> Below 00install.out
>>>> * installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ...
>>>> ** using staged installation
>>>> ** R
>>>> ** inst
>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>> vI[[i]]) :
>>>>? ? there is no package called ?conflicted?
>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts ->
>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
>>>> Ex?cution arr?t?e
>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow?
>>>> * removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>? ? ? Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson
>> <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>> a ?crit :
>>>>?
>>>>? ? FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>>>
>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>>>> Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>>?
>>>>
>>>> New submission
>>>>
>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
>>>>
>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>>>>? ? flowmapping (7:41)
>>>>
>>>> Author field should be Authors at R. <mailto:Authors at R.>? Current value is:
>>>>? ? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email =
>>>> "francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr <mailto:francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr>",
>> role = c("cre","aut")),
>>>>? ? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>>>> "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>", role
>> = c("aut"))
>>>>
>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>>>> ?thematic cartography of flows and movements?
>>>> In title case that is:
>>>> ?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements?
>>>>
>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The
>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>>>>
>>>> /Henrik
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>
>>>> <cartograflow at gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,? l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to
>> use r-devel?
>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received ? error message when I've made
>> dev_tool::check.
>>>>> How can I solve my problem ?
>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> nvoy? depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>>>>
>>>>>? ? Le lun., mars 25, 2019 ? 23:38, Uwe
>> Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
>> <mailto:ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a ?crit :? I cannot beloeve
>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>>>>
>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>>>>
>>>>> with a recent R-devel? version on the package tarball should reproduce
>>>>> the findings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from
>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks
>> automatically.Debian:
>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the
>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>>>>>> ?? R CMD check results ???????????????????????????? cartograflow
>> 0.0.0.9000 ????
>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s
>>>>>> 0 errors ? | 0 warnings ? | 0 notes ?
>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded
>>>>>> Can you? help me to fix the problem?
>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>>>>>>? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org
>> <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list
>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>? ? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
>> mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>>>>? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
>> mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
>> mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>?
>>>
>>>
>>>? ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
>> mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]