[R-pkg-devel] Two problems with fda

Thu, Apr 28, 2022 7:44 AM

Hello, Spencer.

I am solely on Windows, so I am not familiar with the workflow you
need, but I have found the following posts which discuss tlmgr in the
context of a Github action. Perhaps they can provide you with insight:
[1], [2].

Hope that helps!

Avi

[1] https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/551383/cant-run-tex-lives-tlmgr-in-a-github-action
[2] https://github.com/xu-cheng/texlive-action

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:28 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:

On 28/04/2022 10:17 a.m., Spencer Graves wrote:

Hi, Duncan et al.:


        I passed Duncan's suggestions to Jim Ramsay, who implemented
something -- not sure what -- and "fda_6.0.3.tar.gz has been built for
Windows and will be published within 24 hours in the corresponding CRAN
directory"!  (Thanks, Duncan!)

You're welcome.

        My attempts to fix ".github/workflows/R-CMD-check.yaml" have so far
been unsuccessful:


https://github.com/JamesRamsay5/fda/commit/3dd1938d95055ed798a8b6caebcfe0eb8a03668b

Line 50 in that update looks wrong.  It might make sense to have "tlmgr
--version" just after line 53, indented like lines 54 and 55.

Duncan Murdoch

        For me currently, yaml = "yet another misunderstood language" ;-)
And I've misplaced Yihui Xie's recommendations on how to ask for help.
I remember he suggested submitting a question first to Stack Exchange or
Stack Overflow or ..., but I can't find those recommendations, so I
thought I'd here thank Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> and
everyone else who has considered replying to this question, hoping that
someone can help me take the next step.


        Thanks again,
        Spencer Graves


On 4/26/22 11:46 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

On 25/04/2022 8:24 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
   ...

\value{
     These functions return either a standard \code{fRegress} fit
object or
     or a model specification:
     \item{The \code{fRegress} fit object case:}{


Aha, in a \value{} section, bare \items are supposed to mark components
of the value, so they are automatically code.  I think the fix for this
is to make it an explicit \describe list:

\value{
     These functions return either a standard \code{fRegress} fit
object or
     or a model specification:
     \describe{
       \item{The \code{fRegress} fit object case:}{

     ... eventually ...

     }

An even simpler fix:  don't mark the section title as an \item, i.e.
write as

\value{
     These functions return either a standard \code{fRegress} fit object or
     or a model specification.

     The \code{fRegress} fit object case:


     \item{field}{description .... }


Duncan Murdoch

______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Two problems with fda

Thread (11 messages)