Message-ID: <22859.58302.612047.587801@max.eddelbuettel.com>
Date: 2017-06-22T15:35:26Z
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Subject: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check
In-Reply-To: <CABtg=KnL9_yjv42od-YnHZNDBV-feto+m66+7_dfSx9vbFLqRA@mail.gmail.com>
On 22 June 2017 at 16:23, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote:
| So, along these lines, I was thinking if we could / should build a
| pandoc R package, that could just pull the right binary at install
| time. Would that make sense? It is a bit unusual, but I think a lot of
| users would like it, and it would help standardizing pandoc versions
| and usage.
Exactly. That is pretty much what Christoph and I do for x13binary to
provide the (also free but nuisance to build) x13ashtml binaries.
Here x13binary is a CRAN package utilizing a GitHub repo x13prebuilt
containing those builds, and "shielding" the binary.
Other CRAN packages such as seasonal then just depend on x13binary and only
see automagic provision of binaries --- replacing and old scheme of manual
download and environment variable settings. Much better now.
| The static binary is good for 64 bit Linux, and we also have
| self-contained binaries for Windows and MacOS.
|
| (The relevant links to the Docker containers and the binaries, in case
| you are interested:
| https://github.com/r-hub/pandoc-builders#readme
| https://files.r-hub.io/pandoc/
Yes, I saw those when you tweeted about it.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org