Skip to content

[R-pkg-devel] Note: checking CRAN incoming feasibility but the package did not pass

5 messages · Ben Bolker, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal, Uwe Ligges +1 more

Original
Elysée Aristide
# 
Greetings,

I submitted my package CDatanet.
There was no error from Windows and Debian but just this note : "checking
CRAN incoming feasibility"
However, the package did not pass the incoming checks. My understanding was
that this note is normal and does not matter.
Here is the message I got from CRAN.

package CDatanet_0.0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Windows/00check.log
Status: 1 NOTE
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Debian/00check.log
Status: 1 NOTE



Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.


Please, could you help me to solve this issue?


Best,

*-------------------------------------*

*Aristide Elys?e HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Universit? Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com
Ben Bolker
# 
That's weird, I agree that there don't seem to be any issues here for 
you to deal with.  I would write back to CRAN (at whatever e-mail 
address is suggested for correspondence, cran at r-project.org if you can't 
figure it out) and ask for clarification  (presumably the e-mail didn't 
list any other issues they wanted you to fix? Sometimes there are issues 
that are on CRAN's checklist that are *not* tested automatically ...)
On 2/13/21 6:06 PM, Elys?e Aristide wrote:
Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
# 
To the best of my knowledge,  new submissions always get that note,  and new submissions are handled differently, as they are given closer inspection by a human, and since this is all-volunteer the amount of time that can take for the code review can vary greatly.  If you are greatly concerned there is something more than that.  you can respond to the email querying if the only problem is the new submission and you should just sit tight,  or if there is something else.  Again,  since it is a few individuals it may take a couple of days to receive a response.  You can also check the status of your submission both at:

https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard

and

 ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/.

If all is going correctly your package should be in the "inspect" folding pending review.

HTH,

-Roy
**********************
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government or NOAA."
**********************
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
***Note new street address***
110 McAllister Way
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Phone: (831)-420-3666
Fax: (831) 420-3980
e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn at noaa.gov www: https://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/

"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."
"From those who have been given much, much will be expected" 
"the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" -MLK Jr.
Uwe Ligges
# 
You should be reporting everything, the key issue here was

Check: Overall checktime, Result: NOTE
   Overall checktime 23 min > 10 min


which is mainly from the vignette.
Please reduce its check time by using
- few iterations
- toy data
- and if that is not quick enough, try to provide precomputed results.

CAN can also disable vignette checks for regular checks of a package, 
but that should always be the last option.

Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 14.02.2021 00:06, Elys?e Aristide wrote:
1 day later
Elysée Aristide
# 
Thank you very much.

I solved the issue with precomputed results.

Best,

*-------------------------------------*

*Aristide Elys?e HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Universit? Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com




On Sat, 13 Feb 2021 at 19:33, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
wrote: