Hi! I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package merTools (source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD CHECK checks examples, it returns the following error below: Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R': 1: unexpected symbol 117: cleanEx() 118: nameEx Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK (mertools-Ex.R) - it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or source the whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check process, this error occurs. The functions cleanEx() and nameEx() appear to be created as part of the checking process. I have not changed the examples in the code since the last time I ran R CMD CHECK so I am quite confident that the example code for all functions is valid R code. Any ideas on what might be the source of this problem? Thanks! Jared Jared Knowles President, Civilytics Consulting LLC www.jaredknowles.com
[R-pkg-devel] Unexpected symbol when checking package examples
7 messages · Jared Knowles, Peter Dalgaard, Duncan Murdoch
Not just a capitalization issue (mertools vs. merTools)? Barring that, maybe locale trouble? Can you also do things like LC_ALL=C R < merTools-Ex.R ? Also, check for lines starting with "else" (I think you shouldn't be able to run it line-by-line if that was the issue, though). -pd
On 11 Nov 2018, at 21:39 , Jared Knowles <jknowles at gmail.com> wrote: Hi! I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package merTools (source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD CHECK checks examples, it returns the following error below: Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R': 1: unexpected symbol 117: cleanEx() 118: nameEx Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK (mertools-Ex.R) - it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or source the whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check process, this error occurs. The functions cleanEx() and nameEx() appear to be created as part of the checking process. I have not changed the examples in the code since the last time I ran R CMD CHECK so I am quite confident that the example code for all functions is valid R code. Any ideas on what might be the source of this problem? Thanks! Jared Jared Knowles President, Civilytics Consulting LLC www.jaredknowles.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
On 11/11/2018 3:39 PM, Jared Knowles wrote:
Hi! I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package merTools (source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD CHECK checks examples, it returns the following error below: Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R': 1: unexpected symbol 117: cleanEx() 118: nameEx
I also get this error on MacOS.
Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK (mertools-Ex.R) - it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or source the whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check process, this error occurs.
The problem is in the REimpact help file. It contains this:
zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d", breaks
= 5,
and there's no closing paren.
This is in a \donttest section of the examples, so it gets deleted when
running the examples, and that's the version of merTools-Ex.R that is
left at the end. But the warning happened in a different test,
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... WARNING
Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R':
1: unexpected symbol
118: cleanEx()
119: nameEx
^
and it is based on a different version of that file that doesn't omit
the \donttest section.
This is arguably an R bug: the line numbers are misleading, since they
refer to a version of the file that no longer exists. Perhaps when you
say \donttest, no tests should be done.
Duncan Murdoch
The functions cleanEx() and nameEx() appear to be created as part of the
checking process.
I have not changed the examples in the code since the last time I ran R CMD
CHECK so I am quite confident that the example code for all functions is
valid R code.
Any ideas on what might be the source of this problem?
Thanks!
Jared
Jared Knowles
President, Civilytics Consulting LLC
www.jaredknowles.com
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 11/11/2018 6:53 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11/11/2018 3:39 PM, Jared Knowles wrote:
Hi! I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package merTools (source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD CHECK checks examples, it returns the following error below: Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R': 1: unexpected symbol 117: cleanEx() 118: nameEx
I also get this error on MacOS.
Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK (mertools-Ex.R) - it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or source the whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check process, this error occurs.
The problem is in the REimpact help file. It contains this:
zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d", breaks
= 5,
and there's no closing paren.
This is in a \donttest section of the examples, so it gets deleted when
running the examples, and that's the version of merTools-Ex.R that is
left at the end. But the warning happened in a different test,
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... WARNING
Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R':
1: unexpected symbol
118: cleanEx()
119: nameEx
^
and it is based on a different version of that file that doesn't omit
the \donttest section.
This is arguably an R bug: the line numbers are misleading, since they
refer to a version of the file that no longer exists. Perhaps when you
say \donttest, no tests should be done.
Cancel that last sentence: if you run "example(REimpact)", you get a syntax error message, because \donttest is not the same as \dontrun. So this has to be fixed in the original file. But the first part is still right: you shouldn't say the problem is on line 119 of 'merTools-Ex.R', and then rewrite the file so that line isn't there any more. Duncan Murdoch
Duncan Murdoch
The functions cleanEx() and nameEx() appear to be created as part of the
checking process.
I have not changed the examples in the code since the last time I ran R CMD
CHECK so I am quite confident that the example code for all functions is
valid R code.
Any ideas on what might be the source of this problem?
Thanks!
Jared
Jared Knowles
President, Civilytics Consulting LLC
www.jaredknowles.com
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 11/11/2018 7:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11/11/2018 6:53 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11/11/2018 3:39 PM, Jared Knowles wrote:
Hi! I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package merTools (source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD CHECK checks examples, it returns the following error below: Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R': 1: unexpected symbol 117: cleanEx() 118: nameEx
I also get this error on MacOS.
Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK (mertools-Ex.R) - it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or source the whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check process, this error occurs.
The problem is in the REimpact help file. It contains this:
zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d", breaks
= 5,
and there's no closing paren.
This is in a \donttest section of the examples, so it gets deleted when
running the examples, and that's the version of merTools-Ex.R that is
left at the end. But the warning happened in a different test,
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... WARNING
Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R':
1: unexpected symbol
118: cleanEx()
119: nameEx
^
and it is based on a different version of that file that doesn't omit
the \donttest section.
This is arguably an R bug: the line numbers are misleading, since they
refer to a version of the file that no longer exists. Perhaps when you
say \donttest, no tests should be done.
Cancel that last sentence: if you run "example(REimpact)", you get a syntax error message, because \donttest is not the same as \dontrun. So this has to be fixed in the original file. But the first part is still right: you shouldn't say the problem is on line 119 of 'merTools-Ex.R', and then rewrite the file so that line isn't there any more.
I have submitted a bug report (https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17501) about this. Duncan Murdoch
Thank you so much for the help!
The origin of this mistake was mine - I forgot a ' following a # in my
roxygen example code - which meant roxygen ignored the closing parens on
the next line. (See example)
\donttest{
#' # You can also pass additional arguments to predictInterval through
REimpact
#' g1 <- lmer(y ~ lectage + studage + (1|d) + (1|s), data=InstEval)
#' zed <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d", n.sims
= 50,
#' include.resid.var = TRUE)
#' zed2 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "s", n.sims
= 50,
#' include.resid.var = TRUE)
#' zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d", breaks
= 5,
# n.sims = 50, include.resid.var = TRUE)
#' }
Thanks everyone for the help. I never would have found this mistake without
this list.
Jared
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:
On 11/11/2018 3:39 PM, Jared Knowles wrote:
Hi! I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package
merTools
(source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD CHECK checks examples, it returns the following error below: Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R': 1: unexpected symbol 117: cleanEx() 118: nameEx
I also get this error on MacOS.
Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK
(mertools-Ex.R) -
it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or source the whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check process, this error occurs.
The problem is in the REimpact help file. It contains this:
zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d", breaks
= 5,
and there's no closing paren.
This is in a \donttest section of the examples, so it gets deleted when
running the examples, and that's the version of merTools-Ex.R that is
left at the end. But the warning happened in a different test,
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... WARNING
Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R':
1: unexpected symbol
118: cleanEx()
119: nameEx
^
and it is based on a different version of that file that doesn't omit
the \donttest section.
This is arguably an R bug: the line numbers are misleading, since they
refer to a version of the file that no longer exists. Perhaps when you
say \donttest, no tests should be done.
Duncan Murdoch
The functions cleanEx() and nameEx() appear to be created as part of the checking process. I have not changed the examples in the code since the last time I ran R
CMD
CHECK so I am quite confident that the example code for all functions is
valid R code.
Any ideas on what might be the source of this problem?
Thanks!
Jared
Jared Knowles
President, Civilytics Consulting LLC
www.jaredknowles.com
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 12/11/2018 7:56 AM, Jared Knowles wrote:
Thank you so much for the help!
The origin of this mistake was mine - I forgot a ' following a # in my
roxygen example code - which meant roxygen ignored the closing parens on
the next line. (See example)
\donttest{
#' # You can also pass additional arguments to predictInterval through
REimpact
#' g1 <- lmer(y ~ lectage + studage + (1|d) + (1|s), data=InstEval)
#' zed <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d",
n.sims = 50,
#'???????????????? include.resid.var = TRUE)
#' zed2 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "s",
n.sims = 50,
#'????????????????? include.resid.var = TRUE)
#' zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d",
breaks = 5,
#???????????????? n.sims = 50, include.resid.var = TRUE)
#' }
Thanks everyone for the help. I never would have found this mistake
without this list.
Perhaps roxygen should try parsing the code it inserts as examples. It can probably give a better error message than R could, since it knows which .R file it's looking at when the problem happens. Duncan Murdoch
???????? Jared
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com
<mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>> wrote:
On 11/11/2018 3:39 PM, Jared Knowles wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a bit of a weird issue when I'm trying to check my package
merTools
> (source repo available here: https://github.com/jknowles/merTools > > On Windows and Linux builds for R-release and R-devel, when R CMD
CHECK
> checks examples, it returns the following error below:
>
> Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R':
> 1: unexpected symbol
> 117: cleanEx()
> 118: nameEx
I also get this error on MacOS.
>
>
> Upon inspecting the example file generated by R CMD CHECK
(mertools-Ex.R) -
> it contains only valid R code. I can run it line by line or
source the
> whole file in R without any errors. But, during the check
process, this
> error occurs.
The problem is in the REimpact help file.? It contains this:
zed3 <- REimpact(g1, newdata = InstEval[9:12, ], groupFctr = "d",
breaks
= 5,
and there's no closing paren.
This is in a \donttest section of the examples, so it gets deleted when
running the examples, and that's the version of merTools-Ex.R that is
left at the end.? But the warning happened in a different test,
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... WARNING
Warning: parse error in file 'merTools-Ex.R':
1: unexpected symbol
118: cleanEx()
119: nameEx
? ? ? ^
and it is based on a different version of that file that doesn't omit
the \donttest section.
This is arguably an R bug:? the line numbers are misleading, since they
refer to a version of the file that no longer exists.? Perhaps when you
say \donttest, no tests should be done.
Duncan Murdoch
> The functions cleanEx() and nameEx() appear to be created as part
of the
> checking process.
>
> I have not changed the examples in the code since the last time I
ran R CMD
> CHECK so I am quite confident that the example code for all
functions is
> valid R code.
>
> Any ideas on what might be the source of this problem?
>
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Thanks!
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Jared
>
>
>
> Jared Knowles
> President, Civilytics Consulting LLC
> www.jaredknowles.com <http://www.jaredknowles.com>
>
>? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org
<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list