Skip to content

[R-pkg-devel] R Package Submission Problem

4 messages · Abdia, Younathan, MTurgeon, Uwe Ligges +1 more

#
Hi,

My name is Younathan and I am trying to submit it but every time it gives me message that my package does not pass the incoming checks automatically and it gives me 3 NOTES. I tried to fix them but I am unable to do so. If possible do you know how to take care of the 3 Notes. The three notes are as following:

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Younathan Abdia <yabdia at bwh.harvard.edu>'

New submission

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
  Plasmode (3:8)

The Title field starts with the package name.

The build time stamp is missing.


* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... NOTE

Checking should be performed on sources prepared by 'R CMD build'.

* checking top-level files ... NOTE

Non-standard file/directory found at top level:

  'Plasmode.Rproj'

You can also see the NOTES by clicking on the link.

https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/170927_165838_Plasmode_010/00check.log

Please let me know if there is any question or concern. Thank you for help.



Regards,

Younathan



The information in this e-mail is intended only for the ...{{dropped:14}}
#
Hi Younathan,

You can ignore the first note: it simply says that this is a new package.

The second note highlights a few possible problems with your DESCRIPTION 
file. It flags the word "Plasmode" as being possibly misspelled; if it 
isn't, you can ignore the comment. Then it points out that the Title 
field contains the name of the package; as per CRAN policy, you 
shouldn't do that (cf. the manual, 
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#The-DESCRIPTION-file).

Finally, the third note says that there is a file in the tarball that 
shouldn't be there, namely Plasmode.Rproj. You can control what is 
omitted from the tarball using the .Rbuildignore file. In particular, 
you could add the following line:

^Plasmode\.Rproj$

Max
On 2017-09-27 11:47 AM, Abdia, Younathan wrote:
#
More important:

Checking should be performed on sources prepared by 'R CMD build'.

So at first prepare the sources via R CMD build and then check yourself 
prior to submission following the CRAN policies. And *really* read that.

Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 27.09.2017 21:02, MTurgeon wrote:
#
Also from the CRAN submission guidelines:
because you believe them to be spurious) send an explanatory note as
part of your covering email, or as a comment on the submission form.

  This would apply to your spelling issues.
On 17-09-27 03:29 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote: