Skip to content

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN error with current version

2 messages · Daniel Quiroz Moreno, Sebastian Meyer

#
Dear community,

I have an issue with the current version of my package. The current CRAN
version is 1.1.0 when it was submitted, I had no warnings. These days I
fixed an issue and I would like to submit a minor version 1.1-1. I have no
errors or warnings in the local check.

Even though, when I submit to CRAN, it does not pass the automatic check.
The mail does not show any error or warning for the newest version (1.1-1)
but it points to a warning for the current version (1.1.0). I have
corrected this warning in the newest version but it does not pass the CRAN
check.

Please, can you help me how to fix this? I mean, how to avoid the current
CRAN version warnings, instead of the newest version?

If you would like to see the logs, I paste the mail.


package RGCxGC_1.1-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RGCxGC_1.1-1_20200320_181616/Windows/00check.log
Status: 2 NOTEs
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RGCxGC_1.1-1_20200320_181616/Debian/00check.log
Status: 1 NOTE

Last released version's CRAN status: WARN: 2, NOTE: 6, OK: 5
See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RGCxGC.html>

Last released version's additional issues:
  donttest <https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/RGCxGC.out>

CRAN Web: <https://cran.r-project.org/package=RGCxGC>

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on
the R-package-devel mailing list:
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
reply-all to this message and explain.

More details are given in the directory:
<
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RGCxGC_1.1-1_20200320_181616/
The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.

No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.
#
The reason that your package does not pass the incoming checks is
You would need to explain to CRAN why you need to use "snow" rather than
base R's "parallel" package. But I guess you should actually replace
"snow" by "parallel" in your package.

Cheers,

	Sebastian


Am 24.03.20 um 17:50 schrieb Daniel Quiroz Moreno: