Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package ?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago! Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo, this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note Result: NOTE Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal? All declared Imports should be used. which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove the rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling? Best Carsten
[R-pkg-devel] Package ‘wflo’ was removed from the CRAN repository.
7 messages · Carsten Croonenbroeck, Ben Bolker, Lluís Revilla +1 more
Hi Carsten, This seems to be an unfortunate chain of events between different packages: RcppMLPACK -> emstreeR -> wflo Package RcppMLPACK was archived on 2021-12-20 as issues were not corrected despite reminders. This resulted in the package emstreeR being archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'RcppMLPACK'. Which also resulted in your package, wflo, being archived. Later, emstreeR was unarchived on 2022-03-21 after a successful submission improving the dependencies (probably removing the dependency to RcppMLPACK). You can see the source of this info on https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.in About the emails, usually maintainers whose package depends on a package that is about to be removed receive an email with a date by which they should fix the problems. But, as I am not part of the CRAN team I cannot check it. I would recommend preparing a new submission with all the errors and warnings fixed. Note that I think the package will be checked as a new package. Best, Llu?s On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Carsten Croonenbroeck <
carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de> wrote:
Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package ?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago! Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo, this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note Result: NOTE Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal? All declared Imports should be used. which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove the rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling? Best Carsten [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Hi Llu?s, thanks for the clarification. And kudos to your detective flair. I?m serious about that, as I would never have found out about this chain of events. Well, there are no error or warnings to fix, so I think it would be best if someone from the CRAN team could ?unarchive? wflo since there is no problem there and none of the events that were set in motion were due to any of my doings. Actually, I don?t really agree to have to resubmit, and my time for doing so is very limited. Maybe in the next few weeks or so. Best Carsten Von: Llu?s Revilla [mailto:lluis.revilla at gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 15:33 An: Carsten Croonenbroeck Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN repository. Hi Carsten, This seems to be an unfortunate chain of events between different packages: RcppMLPACK -> emstreeR -> wflo Package RcppMLPACK was archived on 2021-12-20 as issues were not corrected despite reminders. This resulted in the package emstreeR being archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'RcppMLPACK'. Which also resulted in your package, wflo, being archived. Later, emstreeR was unarchived on 2022-03-21 after a successful submission improving the dependencies (probably removing the dependency to RcppMLPACK). You can see the source of this info on https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.in About the emails, usually maintainers whose package depends on a package that is about to be removed receive an email with a date by which they should fix the problems. But, as I am not part of the CRAN team I cannot check it. I would recommend preparing a new submission with all the errors and warnings fixed. Note that I think the package will be checked as a new package. Best, Llu?s
On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Carsten Croonenbroeck <carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de<mailto:carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de>> wrote:
Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package ?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago! Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo, this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note Result: NOTE Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal? All declared Imports should be used. which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove the rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling? Best Carsten ______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
* Automatic unarchiving *might* happen because someone on the CRAN
team happens to read this thread, but you will improve your odds greatly
by e-mailing cran at r-project.org with as polite a request as you can
manage ...
* My guess is that nothing will happen until you resubmit (FWIW the
NOTE definitely seems like something CRAN would object to, so you should
fix it before resubmitting ...)
good luck,
Ben Bolker
On 9/22/22 4:15 PM, Carsten Croonenbroeck wrote:
Hi Llu?s, thanks for the clarification. And kudos to your detective flair. I?m serious about that, as I would never have found out about this chain of events. Well, there are no error or warnings to fix, so I think it would be best if someone from the CRAN team could ?unarchive? wflo since there is no problem there and none of the events that were set in motion were due to any of my doings. Actually, I don?t really agree to have to resubmit, and my time for doing so is very limited. Maybe in the next few weeks or so. Best Carsten Von: Llu?s Revilla [mailto:lluis.revilla at gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 15:33 An: Carsten Croonenbroeck Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN repository. Hi Carsten, This seems to be an unfortunate chain of events between different packages: RcppMLPACK -> emstreeR -> wflo Package RcppMLPACK was archived on 2021-12-20 as issues were not corrected despite reminders. This resulted in the package emstreeR being archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'RcppMLPACK'. Which also resulted in your package, wflo, being archived. Later, emstreeR was unarchived on 2022-03-21 after a successful submission improving the dependencies (probably removing the dependency to RcppMLPACK). You can see the source of this info on https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.in About the emails, usually maintainers whose package depends on a package that is about to be removed receive an email with a date by which they should fix the problems. But, as I am not part of the CRAN team I cannot check it. I would recommend preparing a new submission with all the errors and warnings fixed. Note that I think the package will be checked as a new package. Best, Llu?s On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Carsten Croonenbroeck <carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de<mailto:carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de>> wrote: Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package ?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago! Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo, this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note Result: NOTE Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal? All declared Imports should be used. which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove the rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling? Best Carsten [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org> mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Dr. Benjamin Bolker Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
Hi, I would still submit the package: First I agree with Ben that the note is worth fixing (and easily enough you just need to remove rgdal from your Description if it is not used.) Second, and more important, because perhaps in the 9 months since the last check changes in r-devel or quality checks might currently cause the package to fail the checks. The idea behind CRAN, and packages repositories like it (Bioconductor), is that packages in them should work together. Sometimes this makes it easier for developers to write more complex packages but dependencies have their own cost such as this situation. You can share your package via other methods but usually users install packages from repositories. Cheers, Llu?s
On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 22:25, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote:
* Automatic unarchiving *might* happen because someone on the CRAN
team happens to read this thread, but you will improve your odds greatly
by e-mailing cran at r-project.org with as polite a request as you can
manage ...
* My guess is that nothing will happen until you resubmit (FWIW the
NOTE definitely seems like something CRAN would object to, so you should
fix it before resubmitting ...)
good luck,
Ben Bolker
On 9/22/22 4:15 PM, Carsten Croonenbroeck wrote:
Hi Llu?s, thanks for the clarification. And kudos to your detective flair. I?m
serious about that, as I would never have found out about this chain of events.
Well, there are no error or warnings to fix, so I think it would be best
if someone from the CRAN team could ?unarchive? wflo since there is no problem there and none of the events that were set in motion were due to any of my doings. Actually, I don?t really agree to have to resubmit, and my time for doing so is very limited. Maybe in the next few weeks or so.
Best Carsten Von: Llu?s Revilla [mailto:lluis.revilla at gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 15:33 An: Carsten Croonenbroeck Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN
repository.
Hi Carsten, This seems to be an unfortunate chain of events between different
packages: RcppMLPACK -> emstreeR -> wflo
Package RcppMLPACK was archived on 2021-12-20 as issues were not
corrected despite reminders.
This resulted in the package emstreeR being archived on 2021-12-20 as
requires archived package 'RcppMLPACK'.
Which also resulted in your package, wflo, being archived. Later, emstreeR was unarchived on 2022-03-21 after a successful
submission improving the dependencies (probably removing the dependency to RcppMLPACK).
You can see the source of this info on
About the emails, usually maintainers whose package depends on a package
that is about to be removed receive an email with a date by which they should fix the problems.
But, as I am not part of the CRAN team I cannot check it. I would recommend preparing a new submission with all the errors and
warnings fixed.
Note that I think the package will be checked as a new package. Best, Llu?s On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Carsten Croonenbroeck <
carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de<mailto: carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de>> wrote:
Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package
?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago!
Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo,
this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note
Result: NOTE
Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal?
All declared Imports should be used.
which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove the
rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling?
Best
Carsten
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
-- Dr. Benjamin Bolker Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
1 day later
Dear Llu?s, dear Ben,
sorry about being close to impolite before, as you clearly have sensed ("as polite a request as you can manage"... :-)). I have cooled down a little bit by now and am currently processing the package to be resubmitted, but honestly, if this turns out to be as painful as it has been the first time, I will likely drop it half way through.
Best wishes, and thanks and sorry again
Carsten
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-bounces at r-project.org] Im Auftrag von Llu?s Revilla
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 23:22
Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org
Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN repository.
Hi,
I would still submit the package:
First I agree with Ben that the note is worth fixing (and easily enough you just need to remove rgdal from your Description if it is not used.) Second, and more important, because perhaps in the 9 months since the last check changes in r-devel or quality checks might currently cause the package to fail the checks.
The idea behind CRAN, and packages repositories like it (Bioconductor), is that packages in them should work together.
Sometimes this makes it easier for developers to write more complex packages but dependencies have their own cost such as this situation.
You can share your package via other methods but usually users install packages from repositories.
Cheers,
Llu?s
On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 22:25, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote:
* Automatic unarchiving *might* happen because someone on the CRAN
team happens to read this thread, but you will improve your odds
greatly by e-mailing cran at r-project.org with as polite a request as
you can manage ...
* My guess is that nothing will happen until you resubmit (FWIW the
NOTE definitely seems like something CRAN would object to, so you
should fix it before resubmitting ...)
good luck,
Ben Bolker
On 9/22/22 4:15 PM, Carsten Croonenbroeck wrote:
Hi Llu?s, thanks for the clarification. And kudos to your detective flair. I?m
serious about that, as I would never have found out about this chain of events.
Well, there are no error or warnings to fix, so I think it would be best
if someone from the CRAN team could ?unarchive? wflo since there is no problem there and none of the events that were set in motion were due to any of my doings. Actually, I don?t really agree to have to resubmit, and my time for doing so is very limited. Maybe in the next few weeks or so.
Best Carsten Von: Llu?s Revilla [mailto:lluis.revilla at gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 15:33 An: Carsten Croonenbroeck Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN
repository.
Hi Carsten, This seems to be an unfortunate chain of events between different
packages: RcppMLPACK -> emstreeR -> wflo
Package RcppMLPACK was archived on 2021-12-20 as issues were not
corrected despite reminders.
This resulted in the package emstreeR being archived on 2021-12-20 as
requires archived package 'RcppMLPACK'.
Which also resulted in your package, wflo, being archived. Later, emstreeR was unarchived on 2022-03-21 after a successful
submission improving the dependencies (probably removing the dependency to RcppMLPACK).
You can see the source of this info on
About the emails, usually maintainers whose package depends on a package
that is about to be removed receive an email with a date by which they should fix the problems.
But, as I am not part of the CRAN team I cannot check it. I would recommend preparing a new submission with all the errors and
warnings fixed.
Note that I think the package will be checked as a new package. Best, Llu?s On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Carsten Croonenbroeck <
carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de<mailto: carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de>> wrote:
Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package
?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago!
Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo,
this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note
Result: NOTE
Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal?
All declared Imports should be used.
which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove
the
rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling?
Best
Carsten
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
-- Dr. Benjamin Bolker Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Hello. It looks like things to have changed since;
$ R CMD check --as-cran wflo_1.6.tar.gz
* using log directory ?/tmp/wflo.Rcheck?
* using R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ?--as-cran?
* checking for file ?wflo/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* this is package ?wflo? version ?1.6?
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ...^[O WARNING
Maintainer: ?Carsten Croonenbroeck <carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de>?
New submission
Package was archived on CRAN
Insufficient package version (submitted: 1.6, existing: 1.6)
CRAN repository db overrides:
X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package
'emstreeR'.
Uses the superseded packages: ?doSNOW?, ?snow?
Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2560062_Real-Time_Fluid_Dynamics_for_Games
From: man/ShowWakePenalizers.Rd
Status: 403
Message: Forbidden
The Date field is over a month old.
This build time stamp is over a month old.
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking whether package ?wflo? can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ?build? directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... NOTE
Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal?
All declared Imports should be used.
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking contents of ?data? directory ... OK
* checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking LazyData ... OK
* checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK
* checking sizes of PDF files under ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking examples with --run-donttest ... ERROR
Running examples in ?wflo-Ex.R? failed
The error most likely occurred in:
base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv")
### Name: Cost
### Title: Stub for a turbine's cost function.
### Aliases: Cost
### Keywords: Cost Profit
### ** Examples
## Returns a vector of two, c(100000, 100000).
Cost(c(0.5, 0.7), c(0.2, 0.3))
[1] 1e+05 1e+05
## Replace the function by another function ## also called 'Cost', embedded in environment e. ## Also, see the vignette. ## No test: e$Cost <- function(x, y) #x, y \in R^n
+ {
+ retVal <- rep(e$FarmVars$UnitCost, min(length(x), length(y)))
+ retVal[x > 0.5] <- retVal[x > 0.5] * 2
+ return(retVal)
+ }
set.seed(1357) Result <- pso::psoptim(par = runif(NumTurbines * 2), fn = Profit,
+ lower = rep(0, NumTurbines * 2), upper = rep(1, NumTurbines * 2)) Error in h(simpleError(msg, call)) : error in evaluating the argument 'par' in selecting a method for function 'psoptim': object 'NumTurbines' not found Calls: <Anonymous> -> runif -> .handleSimpleError -> h Execution halted * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK * checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK * checking PDF version of manual ... OK * checking HTML version of manual ... OK * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... OK * checking for detritus in the temp directory ... OK * DONE Status: 1 ERROR, 1 WARNING, 1 NOTE See ?/tmp/wflo.Rcheck/00check.log? for details. So, you'll need to fix those in order for the package to reappear on CRAN. My $.02 /Henrik On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM Carsten Croonenbroeck
<carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de> wrote:
Dear Llu?s, dear Ben,
sorry about being close to impolite before, as you clearly have sensed ("as polite a request as you can manage"... :-)). I have cooled down a little bit by now and am currently processing the package to be resubmitted, but honestly, if this turns out to be as painful as it has been the first time, I will likely drop it half way through.
Best wishes, and thanks and sorry again
Carsten
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-bounces at r-project.org] Im Auftrag von Llu?s Revilla
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 23:22
Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org
Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN repository.
Hi,
I would still submit the package:
First I agree with Ben that the note is worth fixing (and easily enough you just need to remove rgdal from your Description if it is not used.) Second, and more important, because perhaps in the 9 months since the last check changes in r-devel or quality checks might currently cause the package to fail the checks.
The idea behind CRAN, and packages repositories like it (Bioconductor), is that packages in them should work together.
Sometimes this makes it easier for developers to write more complex packages but dependencies have their own cost such as this situation.
You can share your package via other methods but usually users install packages from repositories.
Cheers,
Llu?s
On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 22:25, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote:
* Automatic unarchiving *might* happen because someone on the CRAN
team happens to read this thread, but you will improve your odds
greatly by e-mailing cran at r-project.org with as polite a request as
you can manage ...
* My guess is that nothing will happen until you resubmit (FWIW the
NOTE definitely seems like something CRAN would object to, so you
should fix it before resubmitting ...)
good luck,
Ben Bolker
On 9/22/22 4:15 PM, Carsten Croonenbroeck wrote:
Hi Llu?s, thanks for the clarification. And kudos to your detective flair. I?m
serious about that, as I would never have found out about this chain of events.
Well, there are no error or warnings to fix, so I think it would be best
if someone from the CRAN team could ?unarchive? wflo since there is no problem there and none of the events that were set in motion were due to any of my doings. Actually, I don?t really agree to have to resubmit, and my time for doing so is very limited. Maybe in the next few weeks or so.
Best Carsten Von: Llu?s Revilla [mailto:lluis.revilla at gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2022 15:33 An: Carsten Croonenbroeck Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package ?wflo? was removed from the CRAN
repository.
Hi Carsten, This seems to be an unfortunate chain of events between different
packages: RcppMLPACK -> emstreeR -> wflo
Package RcppMLPACK was archived on 2021-12-20 as issues were not
corrected despite reminders.
This resulted in the package emstreeR being archived on 2021-12-20 as
requires archived package 'RcppMLPACK'.
Which also resulted in your package, wflo, being archived. Later, emstreeR was unarchived on 2022-03-21 after a successful
submission improving the dependencies (probably removing the dependency to RcppMLPACK).
You can see the source of this info on
About the emails, usually maintainers whose package depends on a package
that is about to be removed receive an email with a date by which they should fix the problems.
But, as I am not part of the CRAN team I cannot check it. I would recommend preparing a new submission with all the errors and
warnings fixed.
Note that I think the package will be checked as a new package. Best, Llu?s On Thu, 22 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Carsten Croonenbroeck <
carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de<mailto: carsten.croonenbroeck at uni-rostock.de>> wrote:
Hi, I was really, really, really surprised to learn today that my package
?wflo? was removed from CRAN almost a year ago!
Telling from the output at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wflo,
this is due to my package being ?Archived on 2021-12-20 as requires archived package 'emstreeR'.? However, emstreeR is in no way archived (see https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emstreeR). Clicking ?check results archive?, it says that there is only a note
Result: NOTE
Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ?rgdal?
All declared Imports should be used.
which is indeed correct, I don?t use rgdal anymore. What now, remove
the
rgdal import and resubmit? How come I wasn?t informed, my E-Mail is running perfectly. Very puzzling?
Best
Carsten
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel at r-project.org>
mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
-- Dr. Benjamin Bolker Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel