Skip to content

[R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

6 messages · Max Turgeon, Duncan Murdoch, Matt Dancho

#
Hi,

I'm having a difficult time with the pre-tests for Modeltime 0.1.0, a new
version that I'm trying to get onto CRAN. The pre-tests indicate Windows &
Debian are OK. Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks, Matt


*CRAN Pretest Results*

Dear maintainer,

package modeltime_0.1.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/modeltime_0.1.0_20200901_161424/Windows/00check.log
Status: OK
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/modeltime_0.1.0_20200901_161424/Debian/00check.log
Status: OK

Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 1, WARN: 3, NOTE: 1, OK: 7
See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html>>

CRAN Web: <https://cran.r-project.org/package=modeltime>

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on
the R-package-devel mailing list:
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
reply-all to this message and explain.

More details are given in the directory:
<
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/modeltime_0.1.0_20200901_161424/
The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.

No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.

Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service
Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NA
  Maintainer: 'Matt Dancho <mdancho at business-science.io>'

Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
Check: Overall checktime, Result: NOTE
  Overall checktime 16 min > 10 min

Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: Note_to_CRAN_maintainers
  Maintainer: 'Matt Dancho <mdancho at business-science.io>'



*Matt Dancho | Founder, CEO | Business Science*
p: 570-419-4337 <(570)%20419-4337> | www.business-science.io

Want to learn Data Science for Business? Get started today with Business
Science <https://university.business-science.io/>.

<http://www.business-science.io/> <https://twitter.com/bizScienc>
#
Hi Matt,


If you scroll down just below the Windows and Debian OKs, you'll see these lines:


Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 1, WARN: 3, NOTE: 1, OK: 7
See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html>>


It seems one of your vignettes is causing issues when trying to use phantomJS.


Best,


Max Turgeon
Assistant Professor
Department of Statistics
Department of Computer Science
University of Manitoba
maxturgeon.ca<http://maxturgeon.ca>
#
On 01/09/2020 11:52 a.m., Max Turgeon wrote:
That message is about the version that's on CRAN, not the new 
submission.  I think Matt should just follow this directions:  "If you 
are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all 
to this message and explain."  Having OK results rejected sure seems 
like a false positive!

Duncan Murdoch
#
Hi Max,

I appreciate the quick response - The webshot should no longer be an issue.
My latest submission has only one vignette and I switched all of the plots
from interactive (which uses webshot to convert to PNG) to ggplot2 so
webshot should not be necessary.

I think the CRAN Modeltime 0.2.0 results should be corrected. The only one
I see that may still be an issue is the prophet library, which modeltime
uses.

What do you think?

*Matt Dancho | Founder, CEO | Business Science*
p: 570-419-4337 <(570)%20419-4337> | www.business-science.io

Want to learn Data Science for Business? Get started today with Business
Science <https://university.business-science.io/>.

<http://www.business-science.io/> <https://twitter.com/bizScienc>


On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:

  
  
#
Hi Matt,


If you addressed the issues with the current CRAN version, then I would go with Duncan's suggestion below and treat this as a false positive.


Best,


Max Turgeon
Assistant Professor
Department of Statistics
Department of Computer Science
University of Manitoba
maxturgeon.ca<http://maxturgeon.ca>
#
Oh, I missed that. Thank you Max and Duncan!

*Matt Dancho | Founder, CEO | Business Science*
p: 570-419-4337 <(570)%20419-4337> | www.business-science.io

Want to learn Data Science for Business? Get started today with Business
Science <https://university.business-science.io/>.

<http://www.business-science.io/> <https://twitter.com/bizScienc>


On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:23 PM Max Turgeon <Max.Turgeon at umanitoba.ca>
wrote: