Skip to content

[R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

24 messages · c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com, Ben Bolker, David Hugh-Jones +6 more

Original
c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
# 
Hi, 

I come back to you? because I have always the problem with devtools::check of my package. 

I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
sylvain at sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz

When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
????????Attaching package: 'dplyr'
????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
??????????????????? filter, lag
????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union

The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace the package conflicted. 
So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 

But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below)

Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
Thanks in advance to your help ! 
Sylvain
-----------------
Below extract of 00check.log 
* checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... ERROR
Installation failed.
See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for details.
* DONE
Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE

Below 00install.out 
* installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ...
** using staged installation
** R
** inst
** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
? there is no package called ?conflicted?
Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
Ex?cution arr?t?e
ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow?
* removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow?







    Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
 FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com>?

New submission

Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
? flowmapping (7:41)

Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email =
"francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))

The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
?thematic cartography of flows and movements?
In title case that is:
?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements?

Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The
vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com
<cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
Ben Bolker
# 
Have you installed the 'conflicted' package on your local machine
(i.e., the machine you're running the checks on)?
On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
# 
Yes!

    Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 ? 20:21:59 UTC+2, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
 
 Have you installed the 'conflicted' package on your local machine
(i.e., the machine you're running the checks on)?
On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
# 
Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to solve this problem w/o success.?Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance?
On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
David Hugh-Jones
# 
Is ?conflicted? in your DESCRIPTION file? Btw, can we see the package
source somewhere?

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:24, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com>
wrote:
c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
# 
First of all, I used the conflicted package because there had a problem with the package dplyr: Attaching package dplyr Vs stats.?
Maybe I've to put the conflicted package in line depends of the description file.?
Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 8:01, David Hugh-Jones<davidhughjones at gmail.com> a ?crit :   Is ?conflicted? in your DESCRIPTION file? Btw, can we see the package source somewhere?
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:24, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
?Yes!

? ? Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 ? 20:21:59 UTC+2, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> a ?crit :? 


?Have you installed the 'conflicted' package on your local machine
(i.e., the machine you're running the checks on)?
On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Sebastian Meyer
# 
Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
working on these conflicts now.

However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
I see the following output below these messages
So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).

Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().

Cheers,

	Sebastian


Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com:
Martin Maechler
# 
> Hi, 
    > I come back to you? because I have always the problem with devtools::check of my package. 

But we've told you repeatedly now *NOT* to use it in this case, but
rather use

	R CMD build ...
and 	R CMD check --as-cran ...	

    > I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
    > sylvain at sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz

    > When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
    > ????????Attaching package: 'dplyr'
    > ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
    > ??????????????????? filter, lag
    > ????????The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
    > ??????????????????? intersect, setdiff, setequal, union

    > The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace the package conflicted. 
    > So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 

    > But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in loadNamespace...no package called ?conflicted? (see below)

    > Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
    > Thanks in advance to your help ! 
    > Sylvain
    > -----------------
    > Below extract of 00check.log 
    > * checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... ERROR
    > Installation failed.
    > See ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out? for details.
    > * DONE
    > Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE

    > Below 00install.out 
    > * installing *source* package ?cartograflow? ...
    > ** using staged installation
    > ** R
    > ** inst
    > ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
    > Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
    > ? there is no package called ?conflicted?
    > Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
    > Ex?cution arr?t?e
    > ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ?cartograflow?
    > * removing ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow?







    > Le mardi 26 mars 2019 ? 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
    > FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
    > with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:

    > * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
    > Maintainer: ?cartogRaflow <cartograflow at gmail.com>?

    > New submission

    > Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)

    > Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
    > ? flowmapping (7:41)

    > Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
    > ? c(person("Fran?oise", "Bahoken", email =
    > "francoise.bahoken at ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
    > ? ? ? ? ? ? person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
    > "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))

    > The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
    > ?thematic cartography of flows and movements?
    > In title case that is:
    > ?Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements?

    > Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").? The
    > vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.

    > /Henrik

    > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow at gmail.com
> <cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
    >> Hi,? l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use r-devel?
    >> I confirm that I didn't received ? error message when I've made dev_tool::check.
    >> How can I solve my problem ?
    >> Thanks in advance Sylvain
    >> 
    >> 
    >> nvoy? depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
    >> 
    >> ? Le lun., mars 25, 2019 ? 23:38, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit :? I cannot beloeve it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
    >> 
    >> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
    >> 
    >> R CMD check --as-cran
    >> 
    >> with a recent R-devel? version on the package tarball should reproduce
    >> the findings.
    >> 
    >> Best,
    >> Uwe Ligges
    >> 
    >>
>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:
>> > Hello,
    >> > I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
    >> > Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
    >> >
    >> > So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
    >> > ?? R CMD check results ???????????????????????????? cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 ????
    >> > Duration: 54.6s
    >> > 0 errors ? | 0 warnings ? | 0 notes ?
    >> > R CMD check succeeded
    >> > Can you? help me to fix the problem?
    >> > Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
    >> >? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
    >> >
    >> > ______________________________________________
    >> > R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
    >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
    >> >
    >> 
    >> 
    >> ? ? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
    >> 
    >> ______________________________________________
    >> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
    >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel  
    > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

    > ______________________________________________
    > R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
    > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
# 
Thanks to your reply.?I've made the modification for week ago.?As you can see when I submitted I was?1 ERROR 2WARNINGs 1NOTE?
After that I take into account some correction that one person proposed.?I've made R-devel check and I've now?1 ERROR 1NOTE?
Right now I 'm in platform linux.
Have you an idea to solve??Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion.

I will check the other point?

Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 8:22, Sebastian Meyer<seb.meyer at fau.de> a ?crit :   Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
working on these conflicts now.

However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
I see the following output below these messages
So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).

Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().

Cheers,

??? Sebastian


Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com:

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used "conflicted". 

So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem 
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
? there is no package called ?dplyr?
How I can? solve this issue? 

Thanks in advance

    Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 ? 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer <seb.meyer at fau.de> a ?crit :  
 
 Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
working on these conflicts now.

However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
I see the following output below these messages

            

      
      
      
    

        
So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).

Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see

            

      
      
      
    

        
and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from

            

      
      
      
    

        
So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().

Cheers,

??? Sebastian


Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Sebastian Meyer
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
able to help.

"there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
package)? Just a wild guess.


Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograflow at gmail.com:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Uwe Ligges
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
.... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

        
On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks?
Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit :   .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

        
On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
I've put dplyr in import item of description file?

Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 17:04, cartograflow at gmail.com<cartograflow at gmail.com> a ?crit :   How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks?
Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit :   .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

        
On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Maëlle SALMON
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
I'd recommend reading https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare dependencies.




    Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> skrev:  
 
 How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks?
Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit :? .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

        
On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        
? 

??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

  
  


  


      

    

    
3 days later

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information.?Right now it stays only one note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran.?So, I didn't identified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one note.?Sylvain?



Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 17:09, Ma?lle SALMON<maelle.salmon at yahoo.se> a ?crit :    I'd recommend reading https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare dependencies.




    Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> skrev:  
 
 How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
?depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks?
Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
? Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 ? 14:42, Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a ?crit :? .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

        
On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        
? 

??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Duncan Murdoch
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors at R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea? 

You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance 
----------------* using log directory ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck?
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ?--as-cran?
* checking for file ?cartograflow/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* this is package ?cartograflow? version ?1.0.0.0?
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>?

New submission

Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
??????????? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com", role = c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ?build? directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ?tests? ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
? Running ?testthat.R?
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE


    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit :

        
On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
I've seen in file xxxx the message below:
Package hyperref Warning: Option `pagebackref' has already been used,
(hyperref)??????????????? setting the option has no effect on input line 377.

Can this generate a note?

Sylvain

    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 21:01:59 UTC+2, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
  Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors at R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea? 

You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance 
----------------* using log directory ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck?
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ?--as-cran?
* checking for file ?cartograflow/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* this is package ?cartograflow? version ?1.0.0.0?
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>?

New submission

Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
??????????? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com", role = c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ?build? directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ?tests? ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
? Running ?testthat.R?
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE


    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit :

        
On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
The file is Rdlatex;

    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 21:08:39 UTC+2, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
  I've seen in file xxxx the message below:
Package hyperref Warning: Option `pagebackref' has already been used,
(hyperref)??????????????? setting the option has no effect on input line 377.

Can this generate a note?

Sylvain

    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 21:01:59 UTC+2, cartograflow at gmail.com <cartograflow at gmail.com> a ?crit :  
 
  Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors at R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea? 

You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance 
----------------* using log directory ?/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck?
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ?--as-cran?
* checking for file ?cartograflow/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* this is package ?cartograflow? version ?1.0.0.0?
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ?Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr>?

New submission

Author field should be Authors at R.? Current value is:
? c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
??????????? person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com", role = c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ?cartograflow? can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ?build? directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking files in ?vignettes? ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ?tests? ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
? Running ?testthat.R?
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ?inst/doc? ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE


    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 ? 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> a ?crit :

        
On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Jeff Newmiller
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
don't you think other.other at gmail.com is inappropriate?

        
On April 7, 2019 12:01:59 PM PDT, "cartograflow at gmail.com" <cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
    

      
      
    

  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
I put?other.other at gmail.com?because I don't show the name of the person.?But when I've made the check I've put the good name.?

Envoy? depuis Yahoo?Mail pour Android 
 
  Le dim., avr. 7, 2019 ? 21:10, Jeff Newmiller<jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> a ?crit :   don't you think ?is inappropriate?

        
On April 7, 2019 12:01:59 PM PDT, "cartograflow at gmail.com" <cartograflow at gmail.com> wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

            

      
      
      
    

        

      
      
    

        

  
    

      
      
    

  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Duncan Murdoch
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note is 
complaining about that.  I think you probably have put something like 
this in your DESCRIPTION file:

Author:  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = 
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

and what it is saying is that you should instead use

Authors at R:  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = 
"blondeau.sylvain at yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("other", "other", email = "other.other at gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE.  To make 
it easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of an 
issue with the package, they display information about the package 
maintainer in a NOTE.  Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, it 
would probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for the 
message, but that's how it is.

Duncan Murdoch

            

      
      
      
    

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Duncan Murdoch
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
On 07/04/2019 3:24 p.m., cartograflow at gmail.com wrote:

            

      
      
      
    

        
I hope you realize that if your package is accepted on CRAN, the full 
authorship list will be released to everyone.  Hiding it now seems a 
little counter-productive, in that it produced an obvious problem that 
isn't there in the real package.

Duncan Murdoch