I am trying to submit a package to CRAN. It did not pass the automated checks. However, I don't understand what it is I am supposed to fix. I have run R CMD check ... -- as-cran and it seems to pass. And I have also verified that it installs and works on ubuntu and windows. The message I get from the submission system is: Dear maintainer, package msgpack2R_0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the pre-test at: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ 170903_030012_msgpack2R_01/00check.log> Status: 3 NOTEs It doesn't list any warnings or errors.
[R-pkg-devel] Submitting a package to C-RAN
7 messages · Travers Ching, Mark van der Loo, Manny Calavera +1 more
I suggest you follow the link and check the notes..
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, 1:06 PM Travers Ching <traversc at gmail.com> wrote:
I am trying to submit a package to CRAN. It did not pass the automated checks. However, I don't understand what it is I am supposed to fix. I have run R CMD check ... -- as-cran and it seems to pass. And I have also verified that it installs and works on ubuntu and windows. The message I get from the submission system is: Dear maintainer, package msgpack2R_0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the pre-test at: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ 170903_030012_msgpack2R_01/00check.log> Status: 3 NOTEs It doesn't list any warnings or errors. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Check the logs here: https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/170903_030012_msgpack2R_01/ Are you using the latest R-devel version (not the current stable version) to run R CMD check --as-cran ? 2017-09-03 5:50 GMT+02:00 Travers Ching <traversc at gmail.com>:
I am trying to submit a package to CRAN. It did not pass the automated checks. However, I don't understand what it is I am supposed to fix. I have run R CMD check ... -- as-cran and it seems to pass. And I have also verified that it installs and works on ubuntu and windows. The message I get from the submission system is: Dear maintainer, package msgpack2R_0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the pre-test at: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ 170903_030012_msgpack2R_01/00check.log> Status: 3 NOTEs It doesn't list any warnings or errors. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Per https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/170903_030012_msgpack2R_01/00check.log you three NOTEs: 1. Spelling in DESCRIPTION: You need ' around those words, ie 'MsgPack'; I also suggest consistent use of capitals. 2. Installed package size: There is nothing you can here. (Short of maybe using 'LnkingTo: RcppMsgPack' as my package already includes MsgPack) 3. Top-level directory examples: You probably want to have that directory be inst/examples instead. Dirk
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
Thanks for your help! I misunderstood the purpose of 'notes' and was only looking for errors/warnings. Also, could you update RccpMsgPack to use the latest version?
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
Per https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/170903_ 030012_msgpack2R_01/00check.log you three NOTEs: 1. Spelling in DESCRIPTION: You need ' around those words, ie 'MsgPack'; I also suggest consistent use of capitals. 2. Installed package size: There is nothing you can here. (Short of maybe using 'LnkingTo: RcppMsgPack' as my package already includes MsgPack) 3. Top-level directory examples: You probably want to have that directory be inst/examples instead. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
On 3 September 2017 at 11:36, Travers Ching wrote:
| Thanks for your help! I misunderstood the purpose of 'notes' and was only | looking for errors/warnings. You still want to address the fixable notes. | Also, could you update RccpMsgPack to use the | latest version? I can't quite remember why I decided to stay at 1.4.* but yes, I can probably look into 2.1.* as well. Shall we (maybe off-line) talk about potentially merging the two packages? Dirk
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
Sure thing. How did you want to merge them?
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
On 3 September 2017 at 11:36, Travers Ching wrote: | Thanks for your help! I misunderstood the purpose of 'notes' and was only | looking for errors/warnings. You still want to address the fixable notes. | Also, could you update RccpMsgPack to use the | latest version? I can't quite remember why I decided to stay at 1.4.* but yes, I can probably look into 2.1.* as well. Shall we (maybe off-line) talk about potentially merging the two packages? Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org