Hi all
Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand.
First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken
into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word
for "Property registry office") I leave it for now.
catastro (18:64)
kml (18:39)
spanish (12:70, 17:37)
The rest of notes are the ones I cannot understand. All tests are ok.
Examples are running Ok. Tests raised no error, all seems ok but i get
this:
** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [36s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.58 0.16 17.75
geocode_cadastral 0.11 0.00 16.61
** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [37s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.69 0.15 17.24
geocode_cadastral 0.13 0.03 17.73
May I discard this notes and carry on the submission process arguing
is a false positive or do I need to change anything?
Regards
[R-pkg-devel] (no subject)
6 messages · Jose Manuel Vera, Iñaki Ucar, Uwe Ligges
On 05.12.2017 10:04, Jose Manuel Vera wrote:
Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word for "Property registry office") I leave it for now. catastro (18:64) kml (18:39) spanish (12:70, 17:37)
-> Spanish, I guess?
The rest of notes are the ones I cannot understand. All tests are ok.
Examples are running Ok. Tests raised no error, all seems ok but i get
this:
** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [36s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.58 0.16 17.75
geocode_cadastral 0.11 0.00 16.61
** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [37s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.69 0.15 17.24
geocode_cadastral 0.13 0.03 17.73
-> Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec. Best, Uwe Ligges
May I discard this notes and carry on the submission process arguing is a false positive or do I need to change anything? Regards [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera <vera.josemanuel at gmail.com>:
Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word for "Property registry office") I leave it for now. catastro (18:64) kml (18:39) spanish (12:70, 17:37)
You can ignore this if they are false positives. However, you may
consider using \emph{catastro}, with italics, given that it's a
Spanish word. Also "spanish" should be "Spanish", and I suppose "kml"
is KML, the markup language.
The rest of notes are the ones I cannot understand. All tests are ok.
Examples are running Ok. Tests raised no error, all seems ok but i get
this:
** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [36s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.58 0.16 17.75
geocode_cadastral 0.11 0.00 16.61
** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [37s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.69 0.15 17.24
geocode_cadastral 0.13 0.03 17.73
This means that your examples are taking too much time to run. You
should explain this in your submission, or you may consider
simplifying your examples a little bit to get shorter run times. Also
you may use \dontrun{} to avoid running a specially heavy example.
I?aki
On 05.12.2017 18:35, I?aki ?car wrote:
2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera <vera.josemanuel at gmail.com>:
Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word for "Property registry office") I leave it for now. catastro (18:64) kml (18:39) spanish (12:70, 17:37)
You can ignore this if they are false positives. However, you may
consider using \emph{catastro},
No, not in Title nor Description fields.
with italics, given that it's a Spanish word. Also "spanish" should be "Spanish", and I suppose "kml" is KML, the markup language.
The rest of notes are the ones I cannot understand. All tests are ok.
Examples are running Ok. Tests raised no error, all seems ok but i get
this:
** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [36s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.58 0.16 17.75
geocode_cadastral 0.11 0.00 16.61
** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [37s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.69 0.15 17.24
geocode_cadastral 0.13 0.03 17.73
This means that your examples are taking too much time to run. You
should explain this in your submission, or you may consider
simplifying your examples a little bit to get shorter run times. Also
you may use \dontrun{} to avoid running a specially heavy example.
Ideally use toy examples so that they can be executed quickly. not only preferabble for CRAN but also for your users to be able to quickly see what is going on ... Best, Uwe Ligges
I?aki
______________________________________________ R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
2017-12-05 18:38 GMT+01:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>:
On 05.12.2017 18:35, I?aki ?car wrote:
2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera <vera.josemanuel at gmail.com>:
Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word for "Property registry office") I leave it for now. catastro (18:64) kml (18:39) spanish (12:70, 17:37)
You can ignore this if they are false positives. However, you may
consider using \emph{catastro},
No, not in Title nor Description fields.
Correct, I was thinking about Rd files. Sorry, I skimmed through and didn't read DESCRIPTION, despite being quite big. I?aki
That's the issue. My examples are inside a \dontrun{} block
2017-12-05 18:47 GMT+01:00 I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>:
2017-12-05 18:38 GMT+01:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>:
On 05.12.2017 18:35, I?aki ?car wrote:
2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera <vera.josemanuel at gmail.com
:
Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION.
Taken
into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word for "Property registry office") I leave it for now. catastro (18:64) kml (18:39) spanish (12:70, 17:37)
You can ignore this if they are false positives. However, you may
consider using \emph{catastro},
No, not in Title nor Description fields.
Correct, I was thinking about Rd files. Sorry, I skimmed through and didn't read DESCRIPTION, despite being quite big. I?aki