Skip to content
Prev 77 / 1559 Next

license issues R vs. PostgreSQL

This is not really a matter for r-sig-db, and neither this group nor
R-core are going to give advice on licensing issues (we are not lawyers,
for a start). 

You could consult FSF for the meaning of GPL, but I am pretty sure that
the contamination principle would apply.  libR is GPL-ed, and that is
unlikely to change.  Since linking against libreadline is considered to 
need GPL, I expect the same arguments to be applied to libR.

Already R has interfaces to (and has been embedded into) several DBMSs,
included being previously embedded into PostgreSQL (by Duncan Temple Lang,
with sources formerly at least on www.omegahat.org, and still accessible
on CRAN/Omegahat, so it may well be still on www.omegahat.org).  I am
afraid I don't see what makes PL/R (which we have not seen) a special
case.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Andrew Piskorski wrote:

            
How can we answer the last unless you tell us the answer to the second?