On 10 July 2010 at 14:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 10 July 2010 at 11:54, Ross Boylan wrote:
| | On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:41 +0200, Scotti Roberto wrote:
| |> stimulates a very basic question: "Is it possible to avoid building
| |> from
| |> source using R in Kubuntu?
| |> I shifted over from MS only recently. In Windows I used to easily
| |> download packages and use them.
| |> Now, every time I downloaded a new piece, I had the impression that
| |> building from source was necessary.
| |> Am I wrong?
| |> Many thanks Roberto
| | Generally, building from source is not necessary. I think the other
| | responses agreeing that it is necessary were assuming you were
| | interested in some slightly exotic R package (which may be the case).
| |
| | The point of most distributions is to provide pre-compiled binary
| | packages; particularly on Debian these are very good about indicating
| | what other packages they require. If you use a tool like aptitude and
| | tell it you want package X, it will automatically pull in all other
| | required packages. Ubuntu is a Debian derivative.
| |
| | Both R and many of its packages are in Debian.
| |
| | If you have a package that is not already built you can build it
| | yourself or use cran2deb (assuming it's on CRAN). As others have noted,
| | cran2deb is only intended for Debian testing (aka squeeze) on some
| | architectures. It's also currently a bit broken. You can try using the
It is not broken; it is disabled for amd64 while we rewrite it. i386 works
better than ever. And this has been discussed on this list before.
Dirk
| | archive in another environment (e.g., Ubuntu), but if you want something
| | that is not a gamble for R, running Debian testing (maybe in a VM) would
| | be the safest route. Of course, it's called testing rather than stable
| | for a reason.
| |
| | I think the cran2deb packages, which are generated automatically, are
| | less likely to have complete dependency information than those in the
| | main distribution.
|
| Huh? If the info wasn't complete, they'd break. They don't break, so the
| info appears to complete. Please don't spread misinformation.
|
| D.
|
| | Finally, you expressed concern for your students. You can build a
| | binary package locally and then your students can use it. Doing so for
| | someone new to Linux is probably a heavy lift.
| |
| | Ross Boylan
| |
| | _______________________________________________
| | R-SIG-Debian mailing list
| | R-SIG-Debian at r-project.org
| | https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
|
| --
| Regards, Dirk
|
| _______________________________________________
| R-SIG-Debian mailing list
| R-SIG-Debian at r-project.org
| https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian