R 2.2.0 on Etch
[ Gentle reminder: Posting here is open only for subscribers. I had to manually approve this post. --edd ]
On 28 October 2005 at 15:27, Federico Calboli wrote:
| Hi All, | | is there a ETA for R 2.2.0 on Etch (Debian testing) or do I need pinning The best answers to questions like this for any given package are provided by the (source) packages QA page, here http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/r-base.html which both summarizes, and links to, the 'excuses' pages http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=r-base which indicate that the recent rebuild of r-base (due to a bug on hppa machines) reset the 10-day counter. There is also the more specialised page 'Why is ppackage X not in testing yet' at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=r-base | pinning (a solution I'd rather not use)? That fear is unfounded. Pinning works well as _you_ get to select what you included. The 2.2.0.final-4 build requires a upgrade of gcc/g++ et al to one minor number, but the otherwise identical 2.2.0.final-2 installed and runs just fine on testing. Lastly, if you're really afraid of pinning, you could still point to sources from unstable and the use 'apt-get source r-base' to rebuild the new sources on your current system. But I'd go with pinning. Hth, Dirk
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'