Message-ID: <CADfFDC63=kjMr-C4LOF61tRy23-bBFO0s8n3Wsk50zNQaApwSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2012-03-07T07:58:00Z
From: Deepayan Sarkar
Subject: Command completion of the R binary / Ubuntu
In-Reply-To: <20237.53525.534664.107631@max.nulle.part>
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, but this is finally updated (with many more
changes) in SVN to be consistent with R 2.15.0-to-be.
-Deepayan
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
> On 11 January 2012 at 17:33, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> | On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Claudia Beleites
> | <claudia.beleites at ipht-jena.de> wrote:
> | > Dear Deepayan and dear list,
> | >
> | > I notice a small inconsistency with the command completion of the R CMD
> | > check. --no-latex is deprecated sincs R 2.12.0 and defunct since 2.13.0
> | > but the command line completion still suggests it:
> | >
> | > cb at cbdesktop:~/r-devel$ bin/R CMD check --no-<here I hit tab>
> | > --no-clean ? ? ?--no-examples ? --no-latex ? ? ?--no-vignettes
> | > --no-codoc ? ? ?--no-install ? ?--no-tests
> | > cb at cbdesktop:~/r-devel$ bin/R CMD check --no-latex
> | > Fehler: '--no-latex' is defunct: use '--no-manual' instead
> | >
> | > I gather the command line options could be updated to current R CMD
> | > check in file /etc/bash_completion.d/R:
> | >
> | > cb at cbdesktop:~/tmp$ diff R /etc/bash_completion.d/R
> | > 244,247c244,245
> | > < ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --no-install --no-tests --no-vignettes --no-manual \
> | > < ? ? ? ? ? --no-rebuild-vignettes --install-args ?--check-subdirs \
> | > < ? ? ? ? ? --extra-arch --multiarch --no-multiarch --force-multiarch \
> | > < ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --timings ?--use-gct --use-valgrind --rcfile"
> | > ---
> | >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --no-install --no-tests --no-vignettes --no-latex \
> | >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --use-gct --use-valgrind --rcfile"
> | >
> | > I gather from the mailing list archives, that the original is available at
> | > http://code.google.com/p/rcompletion/source/browse/trunk/bash_completion/R
> | >
> | > Should I suggest the patch there? Will changes propagate to the packaged
> | > linux distributions from there or should the updated file be brought to
> | > the attention somewhere else?
> |
> | Thanks for the patch.
> |
> | I believe only Debian/Ubuntu package it (and this would have been more
> | appropriate for r-sig-debian). I'll coordinate with Dirk et al to
> | update the relevant files.
>
> That is indeed almost entirely a Deepayan (juicy code) and Dirk (mere
> packaging) issue as the rest (Ubuntun etc) just follows from there. ?And
> r-sig-debian would indeed have been a good venue too. ?But posting here makes
> it a nice reminder to everybody not using the .deb package about what they
> are missing :)
>
> Dirk
>
> | -Deepayan
> |
> | ______________________________________________
> | R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> | https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
> --
> "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
> dark to read." -- Groucho Marx
>