Skip to content
Prev 5846 / 7420 Next

Fitting a GLMM to a percent cover data with glmer or glmmTMB (Botta-Dukát Zoltán)

Hi Vasco,

An approach called fractional outcome regression sounds like it might be
suitable. It is advocated for variables in the range 0 to 1 (and including
these endpoints)

regards,

James

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:23:32 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Botta-Duk=c3=a1t_Zolt=c3=a1n?=
         <botta-dukat.zoltan at okologia.mta.hu>
To: r-sig-ecology at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-eco]  Fitting a GLMM to a percent cover data with
        glmer or glmmTMB
Message-ID: <f53d9582-73e4-0281-d32a-83d2c2264bae at okologia.mta.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"; Format="flowed"

Hi,

I'm sure that binomial is unsuitable for relative cover. Binomial
distribution are defined as number of successes in independent trials. I
think this scheme cannot be applied to relative cover or visually
estimated cover. It is important because both number of trials and
probability of success influence mean and variance, thus both should
have a meaning that correspond to terms in this scheme.

Unfortunately, I have no experience with tweedie distribution. I am also
interested in experience of others! In theory an alternative would be
zero-inflated beta distribution (after rescaling percentage between zero
to one interval). Do some has an experience (including its availability
in R) with it?

Cheers

Zoltan

2018. 11. 28. 20:47 keltez?ssel, Vasco Silva ?rta: