Skip to content
Back to formatted view

Raw Message

Message-ID: <71D0E54C-1E5C-4F10-BE8A-0A5353D9AD81@oulu.fi>
Date: 2015-11-26T18:15:46Z
From: Jari Oksanen
Subject: RDA
In-Reply-To: <565749EC.4040802@upm.es>

> On 26 Nov 2015, at 20:05 pm, Marcelino de la Cruz <marcelino.delacruz at upm.es> wrote:
> 
> El 26/11/2015 a las 16:27, Richards, Christina escribi?:
>> Hello!
>> 
>> That is very helpful and seems to work! Thank you!!
>> 
>> I did not realize we could use raw data in capscale,
> We could and we should! Currently, it is the only way to achieve it.
> 
> is this true only because it is conditioning variables?
> It seems that the current implementation of capscale only accepts a single *data.frame* for both explanatory and conditioning variables
> 
Yes, this is true: current and *future* implementations of capscale/rda/cca (and future dbrda) will only have one data= argument. However, in addition to variables in the data frame given in data=, you can mix variables in the work environment in your formula. If you think you need to have several data frames for the data= argument, please consider cbind(). 

cheers, Jari Oksanen