Skip to content
Prev 1242 / 7420 Next

R algorithm/package for creating spatial

Dear Laura,

 > Given your comments below, I was was wondering what distribution and
 > autocorrelation model you think generally best represents naturally
 > occurring environmental variables.

It depends on the underlying causes of the autocorrelation. If it's an 
intrinsic process like dispersal, something exponential is likely, or 
possibly something with a fatter tail - there's a large literature on 
dispersal kernels to explore. If it's some thing geological, geographers 
have concluded a Matern model is often the most appropriate. If it's 
some influence of man, this often has an extraordinarly steep structure 
(think clear-fell - sudden changes in the environment) that could be a 
step, or some extreme Matern. If it's topology, you're probably stuffed 
- hugely non-stationary patterns here: think long mountain chains with 
high variability, then large flat plains (we provided some code for 
simulating non-stationarity in the sup info (free) our Ecology Letters 
paper http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123241231/abstract, but 
you really need to think hard). Essentially, there's no substitue for 
thinking something about the ecology and real world that you want to 
simulate... (Why not start by measuring the actual structures and 
distributions of the covariates you want to simulate?)

Colin
Laura S wrote: