Hi, I am looking at the effect of macrophyte allelochemicals on the growth of phytoplankton. The aim of my project is to compare the effect of allelochemicals of two different macrophyte species on the growth rate of two different algal species (the negative effect that is shown as the area cleared of algae) during 10 days and to compare the effect of each macrophyte on each algal species at each day. I used linear mixed effect models for data analysis then I used ANOVAs to do daily comparisons. I received these comments from my examiner but don?t understand what he means. 1. This is part of my methods explaining the data analysis; Linear mixed effect models was used to compare blah blah...... An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse the LMEM. My examiner?s comment; Not clear why you used ANOVA here. Was it to compare models? 2.The effects of TREATMENT and TIME and their interaction were all significant (Table 5). Because of the significant interaction, the analysis was split by TIME. Comment; Given that you have interactions, you should do a model selection to show whether the interaction model is in fact more parsimonious. Can someone explain these and tell me how and when should I do model selection? I have attached a copy of my graph, data and model coding I've used in R. Can someone check if the model coding I used is correct and what coding where and how I need to add for model selection. I also don't know how to put that in words if I want to explain in methods section. Thanks, Fariba Moslih
Linear mixed effects model and model selection
1 message · Fariba Moslih