Skip to content

rpart with circular data?

5 messages · Bálint Czúcz, Dylan Beaudette, Abraham de Alba A. +2 more

#
Hi Rainer,

In a similar situation I used the two components of the normal vector
of the surface ("northing" & "easting"). I.e. for a horizontal plane
both are 0, for a vertical slope facing south northing=-1and
easting=0, etc. This descartian decomposition of the slope vector
avoids the problem of circularity present in the widespreadly used
polar (aspect, slope) decomposition, and thus seems to suit ecological
problems much better to me. However I have not looked into this much,
I am also very interested in the opinion of others.

B?lint
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug at gmail.com> wrote:

  
    
#
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:29 AM, B?lint Cz?cz <czucz at botanika.hu> wrote:
I would recommend going straight to the source-- modeling solar
radiation. This gives a purely physical-based generalization of
terrain-induced variation in microclimate. Keep an eye out for this
paper, soon to be published in Soil. Sci, Soc, America:

D.E. Beaudette, and A.T. O'Geen. Quantifying the Aspect Effect. Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J. March 3, 2008. (In Review)

This paper uses a GRASS-based solution to the problem.

Cheers

Dylan
#
hi all,

if it's potential radiation load that has you interested in aspect, you 
might look at this paper:

Pierce, K.B., T.R. Lookingbill, and D.L. Urban. 2005. A simple method 
for estimating potential relative radiation for landscape-scale 
vegatation analysis. Landscape Ecology 20:137-147.

it reviews the ways that folks have modeled this.

dlu
Abraham de Alba A. wrote: