Skip to content

r2 values from envfit in NMDS

2 messages · Eric Niederhauser, Gavin Simpson

1 day later
#
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 12:45 -0400, Eric Niederhauser wrote:
Kind of, though your explanation is back to front. The model fitted is

x_i = \beta_1 Ax_{ji} + \beta_2 Ax_{ki} + \varepsilon

i.e. we say the axis scores on axes j and k (Ax) affect the values of
the environment. And as such we reverse this silly statement and say
that if there is such a relationship (between axis scores and
environment) then the environment explains, to some degree, the
dissimilarity between sites.

Note that NMDS, like most other ordination methods, is focussed on
sites, not groups of sites. Hence no one ever claimed that it was
designed to best separate groups of sites. envfit simply fits vectors
into k-d ordination configurations; again it knows nothing of groups.

If we *had* a discriminant analysis method in vegan, which does set out
to best separate groups (under certain conditions), then that ordination
may be doing what you want but envfit would still not care about the
groups; it would simply project a vector into the resulting ordination
space.

If you want to discriminate between groups that you have defined a
priori, then a random forest is one of the machine learning tools that
might usefully be applied.

HTH

G