Skip to content

Wascores and their interpretation in metaMDS plots

2 messages · Karen Kotschy, Gavin Simpson

#
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 09:37 +0200, Karen Kotschy wrote:
I think the answer to this is quite simple: are the numbers for each row
("trait") comparable as a set of weights?

In a normal species matrix, the data in each cell will be count or
percentage abundance or some such similar thing. In one sense,
therefore, we can say that the data are all in the same units. This
isn't the case from your description of the data, above.

If they are not comparable (or standardised/normalised to make them
comparable), and I don't see how they can be/are, I would struggle to
conceptualise what a weighted mean of site locations on the nMDS plot
would mean if the weights were such disparate types of data.

G