Dear list, I have some spatial point pattern *X* distributed in polygon *wind* and I wonder how can I simulate different point patterns that by their spatial properties (for example, number of points, spatial autocorrelation of intensity function and etc.) would resemble *X* spatial point pattern? I am very new in spatial point pattern analysis, so I am not exactly sure what parameters should I want to replicate in my simulations, nor do I know the best methods to do so. So far, I have tried a number of different methods, but none of these gave me a satisfactory result. I will share what I have tried: 1. *rpoispp* function from *spatstat* with parameter ex=*X*. Number of points were different and simulated patterns of points seemed to have much more homogeneous distribution than *X* 2. Estimate intensity of *X* with *density.ppp* and *nndensity*. Calculate variogram of intensity functions and feed sill and range parameters into *gstat* function to simulate random field *R*. Than I scaled *R* values so that the sum of them would be the same as sum of intensity values of *X* and minimum value of *R* would be 0. Then I used *rpoissp(R,wind)* to generate points. The problem was that the number of points was slightly different than that of *X* and distribution of points seemed not respectful of *R* image. Finally, intensities of generated point patterns exhibited different variograms. 3. I also tried to scale *R* values from .1 to .9 and use them as probabilities in generating values of binary variable with many trials. Then I filtered the same number of most successful cases as there are points in *X* to get the locations of points. However, the resulting distribution of points was too respectful of *R* and autocorrelation of intensities of these points were different from that of *X*. 4. Finally, with the help of *spsann* I tried simulated spatial annealing algorithm to optimize Kinhom function of random point pattern, so that this function would converge to that of *X*. It worked - functions looked very similar, but the problem is that I do not think that this is the right parameter to optimize, since visually point patterns were very different. Also, the calculation time was too long for me, as I will need to simulate many point patterns. But maybe this was due to poor choice of parameter values, as my understanding of how to use *spsann* is extremely limited. If that's the case and calculation time can be decreased, this method seems to be the most promising - all I need is to choose more suitable parameter to optimize for. Thank you for your advice. --- Ma student Liudas Daumantas Vilnius University
Simulating spatial point patterns that have spatial structure similar to that of given spatial point pattern
1 message · Liudas Daumantas